+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 1361
Latest: Bob Edwardson
New This Month: 7
New This Week: 1
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 100027
Total Topics: 7376
Most Online Today: 4049
Most Online Ever: 35185
(Sat 14 Feb 2026 10:07)
Users Online
Members: 12
Guests: 67
Total: 79

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Tweed

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15
1
Scottish Appointments / Re: Scottish Cup 2025-26
« on: Wed 04 Mar 2026 23:43 »
Ryan Lee is having an excellent season - would have been easy to keep him out the limelight after the mistake at the end of Livingston v Rangers.  I've seen him 3 or 4 times and he's been as good as anyone.

2
Scottish Appointments / Re: Scottish Premiership 2025-26
« on: Thu 26 Feb 2026 20:36 »
He also spotted the non-handball that Matthew MacDermid gave in the Dundee v Celtic game when his VAR didn't, the VAR seemed very keen to keep it moving and he calmed him down and got it right.  Every time I've seen him in the VAR room he just seems so calm and composed and thorough without being overly slow. 


3
I thought the second yellow was very harsh but I could just about accept it as I could justify he knew he was there which would mean a move from careless to reckless.  But football's a contact sport and to me there isn't enough brutality or force to come into serious foul play or violent conduct.  I accept it would have hurt but I don't think we should be giving reds for that.  The second yellow right at the end of Atalanta v Dortmund had a lot more force and caught a player on the napper.  Generally that decision seems to have been accepted (granted I've not read anything on this forum about it!)  But anyone telling me this was more dangerous is kidding themselves.   

4
Scottish Appointments / Re: Scottish Premiership 2025-26
« on: Wed 25 Feb 2026 23:27 »
Given the ridiculous pressure being put on our referees by the Glasgow two and their fans, Duncan Nicolson seems very inexperienced for fourth man.  I also think he's a brilliant AVAR when he's been on the Scottish Football VAR Review so you do wonder if it would have been better having him and Clancy on VAR and McLean holding the jackets!

Also given the red card he didn't overturn in St MIrren v Motherwell, I'm not sure sending Walsh to referee Motherwell is all that clever either. 

5
General Discussion / Re: John Beaton. Aberdeen V Motherwell
« on: Thu 19 Feb 2026 17:40 »
As a Motherwell fan, at the time I felt more of a grievance on the first red card than the second as I thought the ball was rolling through to the 'keeper and the defender clearly slipped (I know that's not a mitigation in the LOTG but given a bit of dubiety on the DOGSO I felt he could have been given benefit of the doubt).  However I've seen a wider angle of that today and Cameron is 3 times closer to the ball at point of contact than Connelly so I therefore grudgingly accept the referee was right.

The Aberdeen one is a straight kick in balls, it actually again happens because the ball takes a strange bounce on the pitch but there is no leeway if you go in with that intensity.

For me the third one is DOGSO - Olusanya is rapid and the two guys coming from wide are so wide I don't see how he doesn't get a decent shot away.  It's been very clear for me getting a shot that's got a reasonable chance of going in has been the bar for weeks and this likely meets it.  That being said, I don't think the yellow was clearly wrong either so while I think it's more red than yellow, I don't think there is enough there for a VAR intervention so in that way I think we've been unlucky.

I thought we had a decent penalty claim later on in the game which could have made things interesting but in the end we lost two guys as a result of one of our players over or under hitting the ball and the decisions while subjective, weren't clearly wrong - we can only blame ourselves we were in that position and then got beat.

6
Celtic were appealing so they could keep going on about the injustice of it all and so they could continue to put pressure on whoever is refereeing them next week.  Willie Collum said on the last VAR review if the player's next touch will be a shot on goal then he considers it an obvious goalscoring opportunity.  The Hearts player was getting there first and was going to have time to either take it in or trap and then get a shot away.  It's clearly DOGSO.  The distances are only really clear from the shot behind the Hearts goal so I can see why it needed VAR but there is no doubt in my mind they got to the right decision. 

7
That is one of the best Championship games I've ever seen.  Ipswich were outstanding and Coventry were maybe a yard off it but you could see in flashes what a good team they were - I thought the towsiness came from the speed that the teams both played at rather than players naturally being at it.  The referee, who I've not really seen before, I thought was excellent.  He seemed in total control throughout and even when he missed something he never seemed flustered.  I think he was rewarded for a relatively high bar for a foul as the dissent wasn't bad.  Coventry will have better days but thought everyone on that pitch worked really hard to provide a spectacle. 

8
General Discussion / SFA VAR Review
« on: Sun 12 Oct 2025 22:50 »
Lots of interesting stuff in this one.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1Egyd6wEe1I

9
General Discussion / Re: Denmark - Scotland. Daniel Siebert
« on: Sat 06 Sep 2025 07:06 »
Steve Clarke said the referee said there was football contact that caused the handball but it wasn't enough for a foul.

For what it's worth, I'm not even convinced it was low enough on the arm to be a punishable handball. 

I think I'd have felt absolutely shafted if that was given as a red, fair play to Siebert for being strong as in the atmosphere in that ground and with his pal in his ear it'd have been easy to go red.

10
General Discussion / Re: Irfan Peljto Bel v Wal
« on: Tue 10 Jun 2025 21:56 »
Being honest I didn't think much of either penalty decision but the bigger problem in this game was that the VAR checks were interminable.  And unless they showed it after I cut off, there was nothing to prove the ball was out in the lead up to the disallowed goal.

That being said, I don't think it was an easy game and broadly he did fine.

11
General Discussion / Re: Match Officials Mic'd Up
« on: Sat 07 Jun 2025 20:33 »
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ojZSkWLwYzE&ab_channel=ScottishFA

Scottish FA May video attached!  Some good interesting offside ones at the start.

12
General Discussion / Re: O LANGFORD - Bristol C v Sheff U
« on: Fri 09 May 2025 10:36 »
I think it shows how difficult it is to make a judgement. If you look hips down you probably give a penalty and yellow card. If you look hips up you see the primary contact with the arms that makes it a red.

Kudos to referee for being fully focused to see everything and getting it right. First time I saw it, I was questioning if it was a foul but with the benefit of a replay its pretty obvious it's penalty and Dogso with no attempt to play ball.

13
General Discussion / SFA VAR Review
« on: Wed 22 Jan 2025 22:55 »

14
I do wonder if Kavanagh was wrongly influenced by the appeal outcome for the Brentford player on Pickford where he, to my mind, correctly issued red and the Brentford appeal succeeded.

15
General Discussion / Re: T HARRINGTON - Wolves v Man U
« on: Sat 28 Dec 2024 21:47 »
Sorry, I assumed the guidance in UEFA had been adopted in the EPL as it has in the SPFL and not used to watching games where that's not the expectation now.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 15