+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 2139
Latest: Matthew Marsden
New This Month: 285
New This Week: 95
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 108780
Total Topics: 7923
Most Online Today: 354
Most Online Ever: 35185
(Sat 14 Feb 2026 10:07)
Users Online
Members: 7
Guests: 320
Total: 327

Author Topic: Wolves v Stoke - T Nield  (Read 250 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 94
    • View Profile
Wolves v Stoke - T Nield
« on: Sat 29 Aug 2026 13:56 »
I feel the cautions have been fine so far but one side has benefited from his decisions, with inconsistent foul detection.

Early on, Galbraith was chopped from behind, where Nield plays a nothing advantage with the ball with the Stoke GK and no option other than a long clearance. Should have been a FK, even Gary Rowett on co-commentary argued the Wolves man was lucky not to see yellow.

The penalty will split opinion but it looked like Jimenez jumps out of the way of Johnson with little, if any, contact. I've seen more wrestling at corners already this season with nothing penalised and that felt very soft.

As I started this, Soumare bursts through two Wolves players and has his ankles taken, right in front of the referee, who decides it's play on, when it's a clear foul.

Missed a blatant foul throw in the first half with Bueno's back leg kicking high into the air on the release to get the distance for a long throw. He's not keen to get the game restarted with the five seconds either, a couple of restarts have been lax.

Share on Bluesky Share on Facebook


  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 9
    • View Profile
Re: Wolves v Stoke - T Nield
« Reply #1 on: Sat 29 Aug 2026 16:26 »
I was at this game, and I thought Mr Nield was inconsistent sadly. There were no major errors, although foul detection was all over the place. I will say it felt a bit like Wolves benefitted slightly (I'm a Wolves fan myself and will happily admit that), although equally there were numerous Stoke challenges that also should have seen cautions and didn't. Not the best performance I've seen, although he did show promise for significant periods also.