+-

+-User
Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock
Members
Total Members: 965
Latest: BlindRef
New This Month: 12
New This Week: 2
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 76139
Total Topics: 5613
Most Online Today: 99
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 1
Guests: 63
Total: 64
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: England v India  (Read 327 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Hendo

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,276
    • View Profile
England v India
« on: Sat 07 Aug 2021 13:39 »
Is it just my perception or is Richard Kettleborough having a mare in the 1st Test? I have seen a number of decisions overturned after review and to me it seems most of them were errors on his part. Can anyone confirm either way?
Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

greeny

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
    • View Profile
Re: England v India
« Reply #1 on: Sat 07 Aug 2021 14:24 »
Kettleborough
Decisions reviewed - 9
Correct decision - 5
Umpire's call - 1
Overturned - 3

Gough
Decisions reviewed - 5
Correct decision - 3
Umpire's call - 0
Overturned - 2
« Last Edit: Sat 07 Aug 2021 16:32 by greeny »
Logged

Leggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: East Grinstead
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Long Retired Level 3
Re: England v India
« Reply #2 on: Sun 08 Aug 2021 10:12 »
I'm not sure that counts as a "mare", considering all the decisions that are not reviewed (and can be deemed to be correct).

It does mean that he is not quite as good as Michael Gough, but then mot many are.
Logged

Hendo

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,276
    • View Profile
Re: England v India
« Reply #3 on: Sun 08 Aug 2021 21:17 »
Quote from: Leggy on Sun 08 Aug 2021 10:12
I'm not sure that counts as a "mare", considering all the decisions that are not reviewed (and can be deemed to be correct).

It does mean that he is not quite as good as Michael Gough, but then mot many are.

Agreed. I think Michael Gough is a quality umpire, reminds me veer much of the excellent Simon Taufel
Logged

Wollongong Ref

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 135
    • View Profile
Re: England v India
« Reply #4 on: Sun 08 Aug 2021 22:51 »
Dare I say the numbers presented would suggest Kettleborough is the better umpire in this test.
Kettleborough 3/9 incorrect = 33.33334% incorrect
Gough 2/5= 40%
Logged

Leggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 716
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: East Grinstead
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Long Retired Level 3
Re: England v India
« Reply #5 on: Mon 09 Aug 2021 06:49 »
Quote from: Wollongong Ref on Sun 08 Aug 2021 22:51
Dare I say the numbers presented would suggest Kettleborough is the better umpire in this test.
Kettleborough 3/9 incorrect = 33.33334% incorrect
Gough 2/5= 40%

You could but that does discount all the decisions where the "aggrieved party" has chose not to review.  All of these decisions (both out and not out) need to be added to the percentage of correct ones.
Logged

greeny

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 596
    • View Profile
Re: England v India
« Reply #6 on: Mon 09 Aug 2021 09:30 »
Yes, the stats I posted are only based on decisions that were reviewed.  There are, of course, far more decisions made during the course of a match.  However, purely based on the stats posted, I wouldn't say Kettleborough had a 'mare' - he still had a reasonable success rate.
Logged
Agree Agree x 1 View List
Pages: [1]
« previous next »