1
General Discussion / Re: Pyramid Patrol 2023/24
« on: Thu 18 Apr 2024 10:07 »
10. Isaiah
|
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to. 2
General Discussion / Re: Pyramid Patrol 2023/24« on: Wed 17 Apr 2024 16:02 »
4. Daniel
22. Revelation 3
General Discussion / Re: Pyramid Patrol 2023/24« on: Wed 17 Apr 2024 08:11 »
1. Genesis
2. Jude 3.Ruth 6. Titus 9. Amos 13. Jonah 14. Nahum 15. Daniel 20. Habbakuk 24 Nehemiah 27. Joshua 29. Hosea 4
Cup Appointments / Re: Emirates FA Cup 2023/2024« on: Sun 03 Mar 2024 09:08 »
Interested to see an interview with Rob Edwards who says that the two managers were asked by the 4th official whether they wanted any time added on at the end of the Luton v Man City match. With Man City winning 6-2, they agreed to end it at 90 minutes which Anthony Taylor then did. There have been a few comments about the lack of added time in FA Cup matches so wonder if this is a common occurrence.
5
Football League - L1 & L2 / Re: Fri 23rd – Tue 27th FEB 2024« on: Thu 29 Feb 2024 09:20 »
Didn't see the game but some Accrington fans are saying that he was one of the best referees they've had all season whilst the manager is highly critical.
6
Football League - L1 & L2 / Re: Fri 9th – Tue 13th FEB 2024« on: Mon 12 Feb 2024 09:26 »
Milton Keynes Dons FC (First Team) v Accrington Stanley FC (First Team)
Football League 2 Referee: Bourne, Declan Assistant Referee: Finch, Stephen Assistant Referee: Head, Ryan Fourth Official: Farmer, Aaron I have deliberately waited until Monday to post this hoping that I can be more objective than I would have been on Saturday evening. The first thing to say is that Mr Bourne got the major decisions correct (including wearing blue when another bright colour would have been an option) and was not responsible for the outcome of the match. I know that Stanley have had a reputation for being masters of the dark arts. Whether deserved or undeserved, I do not think that applicable to the current young team who are guilty of naivety if anything, which may have led to the foul count being 25-7 and 6 yellow cards to one. All I can say is that it just didn't feel right and that whenever two opposing players came into a tackle you knew that the outcome was going to be a free kick to MK. On at least 4 occasions I would have given the free kick the other way. In terms of the yellow cards I have no problem with 3 of them for Stanley or the one which MK received but 2 of the others were for what appeared to be fairly inoccuous tackles in midfield. One could have been for persistent infringement although there was no indication of this whilst the other was a recently introduced sub's first tackle. Maybe if I could watch the match again closer to the action I might have a different view. The big talking point came on 90 minutes when the Stanley winger got past the MK full back with clear space ahead of him and was pulled down. Mr Bourne was 20 or 30 yards away and ran across pulling the yellow card out of his pocket for what everyone assumed would be a yellow card for the full back. Instead, he booked the Stanley player. It can't have been for dissent from that distance so something must have happened that I didn't see. My initial thought was diving but the free kick was awarded. The MK full back was never spoken to for what I considered the clearest yellow card of the match. One further point. A player goes down with a serious leg injury on the half way line on the edge of the centre circle on the opposite side of the pitch to the tunnel. He clearly can't continue and a substitution is made but whilst all other substitutuions are made with the players leaving the pitch at the tunnel entrance, the injured player is made to leave the pitch at the nearest point and limp all the way round it to get back to the dressing room and treatment. Just seemed cruel! Not the greatest game being far too stop start for a match that could nowhere near be described as dirty. I hope it was an off day for Mr Bourne but I'd be quite pleased not to encounter him again for a while. 7
Football League - L1 & L2 / Re: Sat 27th – Tue 30th JAN 2024« on: Mon 22 Jan 2024 16:25 »
Is Adam Herczeg still based in the North East? Fair bit of travelling to Forest Green on Saturday and back to Oxford Tuesday night.
8
General Discussion / Re: Gavin Ward« on: Sat 20 Jan 2024 09:11 »
My first experience of seeing Gavin Ward (at Farnborough c. 2006) led to one of the most amusing incidents I've seen at a football match where a spectator, incensed by the failure to give a penalty, rushed to the front of the terraces and aimed a stream of expletive laden invective at Mr Ward. Having done so, he turned round and in perfect received pronunciation, announced quite loudly to the crowd, "I do apologise, that was totally out of character." I can't remember whether I thought the penalty should have been awarded or not.
9
General Discussion / Re: Burnley Luton -tony Harrington« on: Sat 13 Jan 2024 08:50 »
My initial reaction was surprise that a foul wasn't given under the unwritten rules of the RSPG. As a former Burnley season ticket holder (50 years ago) I'd probably have been jumping up and down and screaming for it. However, I'm glad it wasn't overturned by VAR as I think it was 50:50 and therefore not a clear error. Having praised trafford all evening for coming to collect the ball, I think he'd misjudged this one and didn't seem to be coming out with any confidence. There was a slight move of the attacker towards him, possibly caused by contact with a Burnley defender, and Trafford ran into him. I would still have expected a foul to be given but not clear and obvious for me.
10
Cup Appointments / Re: Emirates FA Cup 2023/2024« on: Fri 12 Jan 2024 08:25 »
If it's West Brom v Wolves I could see the police asking for a lunchtime kick off.
11
General Discussion / Re: National List 2023-24 as at 4th January 2024« on: Fri 05 Jan 2024 17:06 »
I assumed he was working his way back to fitness when I saw he was refereeing National League games. Are we sure that's not the case or has he realised that he won't make the required level for EFL and is happy to just do what he can? Certainly, I've seen or heard nothing from his performances which would have made demotion likely.
13
General Discussion / Re: Pyramid Patrol 2023/24« on: Fri 29 Dec 2023 09:03 »
8. Godmanchester
10. Hassocks 30. Tilbury 14
General Discussion / Re: Rob jones- Forest vs Bournemouth« on: Tue 26 Dec 2023 09:22 »
After the disallowed goal on the stroke of half time at Wimbledon, Accrington Stanley never had to enjoy the delights of Trevor Kettle in the middle again although he did make a couple of appearances with the numbers boards. As far as I'm aware no request was made not to have him again although I suspect any number of clubs may have made similar requests. It just appeared that the appointing powers thought it was a sensible move to make.
15
Cup Appointments / Re: Emirates FA Cup 2023/2024« on: Fri 08 Dec 2023 09:17 »
Apparently the FGR player did have clearance from his parent club but this fact had not been disclosed to the FA. As a result the competition rules allow the FA to impose a lesser punishment than exclusion from the competition. FGR will not receive anything from the proceeds of the re-arranged match or expenses for their additional trip to Scarborough.
|