+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 966
Latest: Caro Bates
New This Month: 13
New This Week: 3
New Today: 1
Stats
Total Posts: 76146
Total Topics: 5614
Most Online Today: 169
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 10
Guests: 114
Total: 124

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Jake the Peg

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5
1
Player puts his arm out and the ball hits it.  The defender is telling the ref that it hit him too high on the arm, not his head.  AR gave it straight away and he had a totally unobstructed view of it.  So did I!

2
Red the red card.  What has the AR said to him - he was a couple of yards away?

3
General Discussion / Re: Sam barrott - Newcastle vs Fulham
« on: Sun 17 Dec 2023 17:02 »


Nonsense. He called a disgraceful and embarrassing situation, a disgrace and embarrassing.



Except it wasn't.

4
General Discussion / Re: Sam barrott - Newcastle vs Fulham
« on: Sun 17 Dec 2023 11:27 »
First of all, Lascelles contact with Jimenez was a foul and a yellow card.  Unless Salisbury thought it was a clear error and should have been red he cannot recommend a review can he?  Secondly, how anyone who has watched that game can say that the Jimenez foul was not a red card is a genuine mystery to me.  He went in with force, had both feet well off the ground so was not in control and made heavy contact with the player's head.  If that is not endangering the safety of an opponent I don't know what is.

Silva has too much history with blaming defeats for his team on refereeing performances.  He has now done three times in a row against these opponents and his behaviour in the FA Cup tie at Old Trafford last season was disgraceful.  Fulham lost yesterday because of the petulance from Jimenez.  He should be berating his player not the referee.  Players make far more mistakes than referees.

I wouldn't be surprised if Silva faces an FA charge for his post match comments.  Questioning the competence of a referee and implying bias towards one team is simply wrong.  If he gets away with it Like Arteta did it will be bad for the game.

5
General Discussion / Re: Newcastle v Arsenal - Stuart Attwell
« on: Sun 05 Nov 2023 21:45 »
There is no way of knowing whether the ball crossed the line before it was crossed unless you guess.  Remember the Japan v Germany World Cup game when everyone said the ball had cross the line and it hadn't.  Re a possible foul by Joelinton on Gabriel, interestingly Gary Neville said Gabriel was bending before Joelinton touched him so it wasn't a foul.  Re the offside, who knows who played the ball to Gordon - you simply can't tell - but Gordon was behind the ball anyway.  Of course the whole matter could have been prevented if Arteta's favourite goalkeeper had actually caught the cross instead of flapping around. 

Arteta is a hypocrite.  Check out what he said to Klopp about accepting refs' decisions because they do their best!!

8
To suggest as the OP does that no other refs have booked players for dissent this season is stupid.  I've seen it happen on a number of occasions.  The players were told at the beginning of the season that dissent would be clamped down on.  It is not the ref's fault if a player chooses to ignore that.  It is also not Gillett's fault that some other referees may not have enforced the law correctly.  Every time I've seen Gillett he has been very good.  Sunderland fans like the OP need to look at the stupidity of their own player and not blame the ref for enforcing the laws and expecting exceptions to be made in this game.

9
It’s interesting that the officials are getting castigated for a mistake but Matip is getting sympathy for his!!  Neither were deliberate.

10
General Discussion / Re: S A HOOPER - Everton v Arsenal
« on: Mon 18 Sep 2023 14:09 »
Does it not make a difference that the pass from Gabriel which was intercepted actually went sideways not forwards?

This is one of the biggest myths in football laws, that the ball has to be played forward for offside to be penalised.  It absolutely does not, but unfortunately a lot of referees don't know this.

It was the correct decision.  No way that could be a deliberate play so the offside is judged from when Gabriel plays the ball.



Thanks for the explanation.

11
General Discussion / Re: S A HOOPER - Everton v Arsenal
« on: Sun 17 Sep 2023 17:57 »
Does it not make a difference that the pass from Gabriel which was intercepted actually went sideways not forwards?

12
General Discussion / Re: A MADLEY - Newcastle v Aston Villa
« on: Sun 13 Aug 2023 12:32 »
Said yellow as it happened

I hate seeing fouls like that which have nothing to do with the ball and are often referred to as "taking one for the team".  It could be argued in that instance that totally ignoring the ball, grabbing a player round the body and chucking him to the ground is violent conduct??

13
What was wrong with the original interpretation of handball that I was brought up with - it was the only action on the pitch that has to be deliberate for it to be a foul. The ball hitting a player’s hand when he is not deliberately moving his hand towards it is an accident, not a foul.

14
Missing things is understandable and forgivable but seeing things that didn't happen raises questions.
To paraphrase Sir Humphrey - it is characteristic of every incident occurring on the field of play that every individual in attendance has a vivid recollection of them, and that every individual's recollection of them differs violently from every other individual's recollection.

It is an inexorable flaw of being human that information received by the senses can become distorted when the brain attempts to discern or recollect said information. I would call it unseemly to imply anything other than human error as being the cause of the mistake here, as you appear to be doing.

Sorry I wasn’t implying anything other than human error. I don’t believe referees are bent or biased (other than in favour of the “top six”!).  I was just trying to understand how such an error could occur. As I said, not seeing something is fine but seeing something that didn’t happen is strange and hard to get my head round.

15
I don’t get it. How can the red card be overturned if the decision was correct. I’m not a ref so don’t understand this.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5