Have only seen it live, and thought at the time it looked 'soft', but once given it has to be a Red Card.
Indeed, due to the delay I wonder if the AR gave it?
I do miss the flag across the chest signal which makes it obvious.
After that I thought that Mr Breakspear was very inconsistant.
Everybody knew that the next Peterborough foul would lead to a caution and it did, although it was no where as bad as what had gone previously.
He then let numerous similar challenges go from both sides before realising he had to get control and cautioning for a very minor offence.
This led to the crowd, but more importantly the players losing a lot of respect for him and his decisions, and nobody knew what was a foul or a caution.
As an aside, what role can the 4th official have in decision making?
A clash right in front of the dug-outs with claim from the bench for handball.
It was obvious that the ref or assistant couldn't see because of the players blocking their view, but after a delay a free kick was given.
Again, the benches confronted the 4th official who had perhaps inadvertantly given the decision.
Is this allowed?
After having a look I agree that the call has come from his AR. It's a foul, he was pushed in the back. The reaction of Phillips when the penalty was awarded (to me) showed that he knew he got busted. The flare up from the players was the sanction of a red card. The question: If attacker was not pushed by Phillips did they have a clear header on goal? Answer: Yes.
It may have been a 'soft' push, but it prevented a potential goal scoring opportunity.