+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 1360
Latest: Stephen Midgley
New This Month: 6
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 99911
Total Topics: 7365
Most Online Today: 1157
Most Online Ever: 35185
(Sat 14 Feb 2026 10:07)
Users Online
Members: 7
Guests: 73
Total: 80

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - Skydank

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6
1
I hope Mr Atkinson performs better at Colchester than he did at Peterborough,  where he issued 11 yellows and a red in a game where  many of both sides described his performance as the worst they have ever seen...plainly ridiculous thing to say, but it was a very bad and inconsistant day at the office

2
General Discussion / Mr Duckworth - Peterborough v Stevenage
« on: Wed 26 Nov 2025 08:53 »
Mr Duckworth’s early career reviews on this forum were never particularly strong, with many describing him as “not quite there” or “manufactured.” Unfortunately, his performance at a cold London Road last night reflected those views.

He allowed an experienced Stevenage side to manage him throughout—slowing the game down, committing tactical fouls, and repeatedly going down for treatment. On each occasion, Mr Duckworth appeared to conduct his own medical assessment before calling the physio, consistently falling for the “dark arts” that Stevenage employed.

He began well, correctly cautioning a Stevenage player for a cynical early foul despite protests. However, from that point on his decision-making lacked consistency. Mandatory cautions for clear pull-backs were ignored, with the next yellow cards instead given for dissent, as frustration grew on what was a foul and a caution.

The biggest inconsistency came with two penalty decisions: one rightly awarded to Stevenage, but a very similar incident at the other end not given for Peterborough. These things can happen, but what was most frustrating was his management of set pieces. In a match already slowed to a crawl, he took nearly four minutes over each free kick—setting the wall, lecturing every player, checking the ball, then returning to the wall. The minimal added time was, frankly, farcical. Posh probably wouldn’t have broken down Stevenage regardless, but the handling was poor.

On the positive side, he covered the pitch well and tried to play advantages where possible. But on this showing, he appears to need more experience before progressing further up the ladder, as he was thoroughly outmanoeuvred by seasoned professionals.

3
I initially had reservations about Mr. Mulhall overseeing just his second League One fixture at Peterborough—it felt like a potential gamble. However, any doubts were quickly dispelled. He appeared physically sharp, covered the pitch with confidence, and communicated his decisions effectively, which were largely accurate and consistent. He also allowed play to flow with some well-judged advantages.

A couple of bookings did seem a touch severe, particularly one issued to a Posh player who reacted angrily after being struck by the ball at close range while grounded. That said, Mr.Mulhall generally maintained good control of the match.

One aspect that may warrant attention is the time taken to restart play following free kicks. On several occasions, he had to all bring back play and reposition the ball after setting up defensive walls of only one player, which slowed the game unnecessarily. While it would have been understandable if the wall contained a number of players, his insistence on pacing out the full ten yards and using the spray—even for free kicks just inside the halfway line—felt excessive and led to frustration on both sides.

A strong performance on the whole, and I hope his journey in refereeing continues to flourish.

4
Surprised to see that the bottom of the table match Posh v Blackpool has been given to Sam Mulhall.

Was expecting a little more experience for what is at stake.

However, as ever, good luck to all concerned this weekend. 

5
Agree about Mr Durkin..did nothing obviously wrong, but as standard, did little to cut out some obvious time wasting late in the game, and after a yellow for a posh player which could have been a talking too, let a number of Bradford players cynically break up attacks without a word bing said....agree that didn't move around the pitch very well, and not sure of advice to assistants who for a few minutes flagged for everything and then didn't give decisions right in front of them when Mr Durkin then blew for foul....things to work on for sure, and did play a couple of great advantage, but a long way to go before matching his father,  but would be delighted to see it

6
A strange performance from Mr Woods and one that I think will have taught him a lot.

Very brave to give the red card after 15 seconds, and it sounds silly but he gave himself  some thinking time.

After that gave a few soft decisions that appeared to be 'equalling up' but then changed again to not giving Shrewsbury some very obvious decisions including a second penalty.

After that nobody really sure what was a foul or not and Mr Woods did seem a little lost at time.

To his credit played 14 minutes additional time during the match which I liked to see, but based on previous officials 10 was what was expected.

Good fitness and communication and played some great advantages,  but sometimes he has to remember this is division 3 football and a free kick outside the area or in middle of the park to release pressure is what yhe fans and players expect.

It's a personal thing but wish we adopt the rugby system of going back to give a free kick, but that's a discussion for another day.

Local press and fans very dismissive of him, which after a home win says something about his performance which I thought was unfair.

So a mixed bag, some brave decisions,  some baffling decisions, but it made for an exciting game and provided Mr Woods with some interesting lessons which I'm sure he will take on board as he progresses his officiating career.

7
Cup Appointments / Re: Emirates FA Cup 2023/2024
« on: Mon 03 Feb 2025 13:29 »
Quote from: RateTheRef
You used the dumb emoji on a post in the fa cup appts thread. This is against forum rules. The dumb emoji is banned on this forum due to it being rude offensive and provocative.  Please do not use it again or account sanction will result.

Just received the warning above:
I'm very sorry - i had no idea i had even done this - i don't think i even know how to add/comment or emojis.

Apologies for anybody inadvertently offended

Skydank


8
I agree with the above, when I first saw Mr Chilowicz he looked very good as I think he was officiating in a natural way, and I think I reported such on this forum, the last couple of times he has become very "showy" with exaggerated signals and sprints to highlight his authority,  neither of which actually does as it seems how he sells the decision is now more important than the accuracy of the decisions themselves .... getting back to his natural style will help in my opinion

9
Cup Appointments / Re: The Emirates FA Cup - 2024/2025
« on: Sun 03 Nov 2024 16:18 »
Looks like a goal should have been given...but totally understand why it wasnt

11
Cup Appointments / Re: The Emirates FA Cup - 2024/2025
« on: Sun 03 Nov 2024 08:23 »
Mr Martin Newport v Peterborough

Sorry not able to post link but available on bbc site, but an interesting decision for 'muscle man' and the assistant  yesterday...

Ball ends up in the net after a corner, nobody sure how but 'goal' not given. Restart with a corner.

Not something I've seen very often

12
Well spotted...and I haven't the excuse of being inexperienced

13
Mr Elliot Peterborough v Rotherham

Well the crowd sang `you're not fit to referee' a number of times...unfair on Mr Elliot as he was certainly fit and up with play...perhaps 'you're not ready to referee at this level' would be nearer the mark...

Although promising aspects, did look like 'a rabbit in the headlights' at times.
Decision making  very inconsistent  and arbitrary at best, with who shouted loudest getting the call.
Couldn't argue with his cautions but the same challenges were not punished just moments later.

As I said, you could see why he has been promoted, just today solid old pros and managers had his number and he wasn't experienced enough to deal with it.

Saying that, if he doesn't get to officiate these games he won't get the experience

14
Mr Parkinson Peterborough v Stevenage
More than 50 years watching Posh and I have never seen a game delayed for 30 minutes because of a rain affected pitch.

Mr Parkinson correctly took the players off during a downpour on 65 minutes when the ball stopped rolling, and was calm and professional during his deliberations to get the game back on.

A small area of the pitch didn't drain immediately but he gave time for the ground staff to fix it, where it might have been easier to call match off.

As for his performance, it wasn't the most difficult match to officiate, and rather than a couple of very obvious missed advantages, nothing else to say, and not to bad.

He will have much more difficult matches in the future, but his calm approach to last night should hold him in good stead.     

15
Very surprised that the return of the delightful Mr Evans and Raynor to London Road has been given to Mr.Bell...was certainly expecting a more experienced head...as ever, good luck to all concerned

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6