|
This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.
Messages - Failed Ref
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 57
1
« on: Tue 17 Mar 2026 10:59 »
The celebration by one of the Palace players when the red was finally issued was hilarious. You would have thought they (Palace) had scored a goal.
2
« on: Tue 17 Mar 2026 10:57 »
Reviewing RefWatch, I too cannot understand why Newcastle didn't get a penalty. When you are holding a player for a prolonged period of time in the box and never ever look at the ball, you should be penalised. It was not as if there were other players involved. Bizarre.
3
« on: Tue 17 Mar 2026 10:54 »
That no penalty decision will go down as a VAR error. I suspect both VAR and Madley looked at the upper body contact which was negligible but failed to look at the interaction of the player's feet. RefWatch agreed that it was a penalty.
4
« on: Tue 10 Mar 2026 09:43 »
I have read something similar before, that Kevin Friend says they should have had 2 penalties. I find it unsettling that this is made public. Has he seen replays? Has the referee agreed? Indeed, was the referee in a position to see the incident? I agree that a couple of possible penalties were denied Ipswich, but at least 1 could be a 50:50 call. Did the Ipswich manager go on the pitch to remonstrate with the referee or at least initially to move his players away?
5
« on: Mon 09 Mar 2026 15:10 »
There was a rugby game where a referee issued 2 reds towards the end of the game. Conveniently the camera was recording wild life and not the incident. The home team contested the red card and at the hearing a QC (!!) questioned whether the ref could have seen both incidents clearly enough to justify the red! At that level, 4 I think, the appeal was upheld. How you can see 23 red card offences I do not know. In this incident, the league were furious so charged the club for failing to control their players. Club lost 5 points which relegated them! Justice.
6
« on: Mon 09 Mar 2026 09:21 »
From the highlights, 10 minutes at best, there were several penalty claims turned down. Reasonable calls in all 3 cases, but the third, at the end of the game, may have been the last straw. However, I am not convinced by the penalty claim and the referee would have needed a clear view. IMHO, he gave what he saw which was play on. Referee's decision is final but sadly we have lost that element of the game.
7
« on: Mon 02 Mar 2026 09:12 »
Why have the Premier League allowed their rules and playing regulations to be changed to accommodate one particular religious group? This is not intended to be racist or in any way anti-religion, let’s make that clear before the thought police start getting involved. I believe in inclusion. However, if a player’s religion means that they may not be fit to play according to normal regulations, they should not be picked. Interestingly, why do Muslims play for clubs with strong gambling connections? Religion is very personal, a sincerely held belief which helps to shape people’s lives, give them structure, a purpose, a reason for living. I respect and understand this. However, there are many religions, and no-one can say which (if any) are right. Therefore, it is essential that one person’s religion should not be allowed to dictate what others can do or impact on them provided they are going about lawful business. I will always support one’s right to practice their religion without fear of persecution and I abhor discrimination, but religion should be practiced at home, churches or whatever, and in how they conduct themselves but with the proviso previously stated. Christians have long lost the right to argue that Sunday is a special day and indeed are in certain jobs where they are not allowed to wear open crucifixes in case they might offend people – i.e. non-Christians. Muslim beliefs allow women’s rights to be subordinated below that of men, prevents schoolgirls from competing in sports. In extremism, you get Taliban beliefs. It cannot be right that peaceful Jews most of whom dislike what Israel is doing should feel isolated and afraid in this country. That is not a society I want or believe in. As for Sharia Law? No way. One law for everyone. The Premier League got this badly wrong. It was illogical, irrational driven by a desire to accommodate what group of individuals. A fear of being accused of discrimination.
As I write, our armed services are risking their lives to protect our interests, our society, our freedoms. Made up almost entirely of white or black serviceman, who are expected to protect others, their freedoms, their right to protest but without the commitment that our brave servicemen and women have made.
The English Premier League was wrong to make allowances for one faith. A dangerous precedent.
Moderators. ( edited, excellent post nearly removed for the clear attempt at undermining mods and admin , nothing wrong with your post until that point, no need whatsoever for that part , next time the post will not be edited it will be removed!)
8
« on: Thu 26 Feb 2026 09:07 »
At least a foul throw was picked up. The sarcastic clap was appropriately carded.
9
« on: Tue 24 Feb 2026 12:06 »
On Ref Watch, DG when commenting on the correct red card said he was very good or words to that effect. A shame for the city of Sheffield which really needs a Premier League Club.
10
« on: Tue 24 Feb 2026 11:50 »
After my comment regarding why I prefer Championship football as opposed to Premiership, another reason is to add the rugby mauls at corner kicks. How does a referee manage that? Another corner, another delay. Football coaches are trying to push the LOTG and arguably the spirit of the game (whatever that may be) to benefit them. It is human nature, you see it in life generally when a law is introduced and people will find a way around it. What can FIFA do as the present farce is not a good view (OK for me at least). I see that FIFA are trying to find a way of preventing doubtful injuries where say the goalkeeper goes down when their team is under pressure. There is disagreement amongst countries and furthermore concern about the unintended consequences of changes to the Laws. I have a lot of time for Eddie Howe but it was his team that twice adopted the tactic of letting the goalkeeper go down during a period of pressure and I find it much harder now to respect him. However, I admit he is not the only one.
11
« on: Mon 23 Feb 2026 09:58 »
Another game with a no look challenge. Eyes never on the ball, always on the attacker who was taken out. Cynical AND just after the City player had been cautioned. Should have been a second yellow imho. City were lucky in this respect.
12
« on: Sun 22 Feb 2026 21:18 »
While this game was important for both sides, it being a local derby as well as a critical match for Arsenal's title credentials I found the whole game frustrating and exhibiting the worst aspects of modern football. The pulling, holding with two arms over the shoulders for example, the attempt to play the man with no eyes on the ball (missed by Bankes), the time wasting at set pieces and throw ins in particular. Factor in the "not me ref" expressions and it all gets a bit tedious. Bankes let too much go but he is not alone. It appears to be policy to allow this all to happen and is turning me away from the Premier League. It is Webb says what fans tell us what they want. Well not me! This is not a criticism of Peter Bankes. He is doing his job as instructed and apart from the one incident mentioned above he had a fine game. He is in good form.
13
« on: Thu 19 Feb 2026 11:31 »
Is it any wonder that I have stopped watching Premier League games with a few exceptions I should add. Keepers going down feigning injury, players holding their head before they hit the ground as per last night, tactical time wasting. Ironically, Wolves got their winner in injury time! Some form of karma.
Watching Arsenal is like watching Netflix - you are always left waiting for the next season! (Quote from a former Arsenal player, I couldn't think of anything so amusing)
14
« on: Wed 18 Feb 2026 15:56 »
I don't think our referees are bad either. Alan Shearer has apparently intimated that he may have gone too far on BBC although inevitably and sadly the masses agreed with him and felt honest comment was needed. In that game the refereeing team made several errors but CK is a very experienced, quality referee. His assistants are no spring chickens in terms of experience either but they don't make errors based on what they see. The more I reflect on that game, the more convinced I am that the officials simply didn't see everything. They are human. Why should we assume they must? They cannot guess, thy have to apply the LOTG based on what they actually observe. Shearer made his criticism personal without knowing the facts and with no understanding of how difficult it is to referee. This is why VAR is needed although how it operates may be open to discussion. 8 minutes to make a decision is ridiculous!
15
« on: Mon 16 Feb 2026 18:28 »
Posted this on the appointments page.: Dale Johnson in his role as football issues correspondent for the BBC states that Referee Chris Kavanagh and his assistant Nick Greenhalgh have not been selected for a Premier League game this weekend. He doesn't say why but of course refers to the errors in the Aston Villa match adding one I missed, the potential offside of Burn for the Newcastle equaliser. Johnson then goes on to say that Professional Game Match Officials (PGMO) bases its selections on factors including post-match performance assessments conducted by an independent Key Match Incidents panel, ensuring accountability for officials. There is in my opinion an implication there. He does go on to say, "However, despite the criticism Kavanagh is highly regarded and in December was promoted to Uefa's elite list of referees to join Michael Oliver and Anthony Taylor." Absolutely right and he has had a long period of excellent performances. It is time to move on, wish Kavanagh all the best of luck and hope everyone appointed this coming weekend has a good game and that bit of luck. Some interesting appointments. Agree. Shearer was out of order. A more temperate response was really needed, not ther social media sensationalist approach which is even creeping into the BBC.
Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 57
|