+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 1361
Latest: Bob Edwardson
New This Month: 7
New This Week: 1
New Today: 1
Stats
Total Posts: 99986
Total Topics: 7371
Most Online Today: 3568
Most Online Ever: 35185
(Sat 14 Feb 2026 10:07)
Users Online
Members: 9
Guests: 99
Total: 108

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - DublinRef

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 55
1
General Discussion / Re: Current Injured Officials
« on: Tue 10 Mar 2026 15:14 »
Could retirement be on the cards for Bond? 48 y/o, seems to be injured, no appointment all season, has had a good few seasons at the top. No offence to anyone of that age but surely it is hard to come back from an injury at that age? Of course it’s possible but I imagine it’s much more difficult the older you get.

No info has come to light about Mr Bond so dont think we should speculate about retirement as of yet.

I haven’t followed this closely, has he been appointed as VAR?

2
General Discussion / Re: An answer to nature's call
« on: Sat 28 Feb 2026 21:15 »
It’s really poor for imo for top level officials to have to deal with equipment failures. I have no doubt the technical staff work extremely hard and no blame whatsoever on them, but if a referee needs to leave for a number of minutes as Craig did, something has to improve.

A good performance otherwise I felt?

3
General Discussion / Re: C PAWSON - Liverpool v Man City
« on: Sun 08 Feb 2026 18:33 »
Well if there was ever a case for blowing up a tad early…..

Correct decision in the end, Gary Neville’s comments make no sense, to nobodies surprise.

4
General Discussion / Re: C PAWSON - Liverpool v Man City
« on: Sun 08 Feb 2026 18:24 »
I think Craig Pawson has had a very good game. All big calls correct.

The one thing that lets him down is he appears too passive. As we have seen from the VAR audio clips, Pawson is extremely calm on the pitch. As a result, I sometimes think he doesn’t react to dissent, most likely as he isn’t bothered or fazed at all, but it looks bad and undermines authority. Even for the penalty, huge call correct, but he just keeps a small peep of the whistle and loosely points at the spot. Don’t get me wrong, his ability to stay calm is a huge asset, but I think  he should raise his body language a small bit at times.

5
What is the standard of review on appeal?

I agree fully with rustyref, I feel the on field decision should have stood for the reasons he gave. However, I do not feel a red card would have been a clear and obvious error either. Given after OFR a red card was issued, is the ban upheld as the red card decision, regardless of how it was reached, is not itself clearly wrong?

6
Ref has lost complete and utter control.

I know what you mean but respectfully I disagree. You can’t control a team that behaves like this no matter who the referee is.

7
The referee should blow the whistle, abandon the match, and walk off the pitch. Disgraceful from Senegal, doesn’t matter if the decision is right or wrong. Cannot accept behaviour like this. Match should simply be awarded to Morocco. 

8
General Discussion / Re: Tom Kirk - Everton v Wolves
« on: Wed 07 Jan 2026 21:22 »
I agree excellent refereeing, I only hope the PGMOL back him, and it isn’t suggested that next time he might manage (i.e. ignore) the situation.

9
General Discussion / Re: C Pawson- Fulham v Liverpool
« on: Mon 05 Jan 2026 13:07 »
Where does the 5 cm come from? Is that the actual error tolerance of the system or have the PGMOL just arbitrarily made up that limit?

I do really struggle to understand why since day one with VAR the PGMOL have decided that they need to use a different approach for this ill conceived idea of ‘appreciating what football wants’. I’m not even sure what that means, but I think most would be perfectly happy without these seemingly arbitrary interpretations and applications that over complicate what should be a simple situation.

Finally I feel bad for the on field officials. Craig Pawson by all accounts put in a very fine performance yet his game is marked with controversy through no fault of his own. That can’t help anyone’s confidence.

10
General Discussion / Re: Chris Kavanagh
« on: Fri 12 Dec 2025 18:33 »
Congratulations also to Rob Hennessy from Ireland on his promotion to the UEFA first group, fantastic achievement.

11
Interesting game for the referee, I thought on the whole he was fine but I wasn't always a fan of his disciplinary approach, I thought he let a number of heavy challenges go, but not totally consistently. I think AR1 made a number of excellent offside calls and I think on the whole, in a huge game of this magnitude the officials can be satisfied in delivering a performance where the focus is on the teams and the incredibly dramatic ending.

One thing annoyed me that was after a fantastic and dramatic win, our manager appeared to approach referee to dissent. He wasn't ranting or raving, or even appeared to be disrespectful, but I would think he would just be delighted with the result! I'm not sure we deserved to win that game - but I won't complain!


12
Indeed the still images I have seen do look offside, but there have been many times where even a slight angle can make a player look offside who is just on. Would be nice to see the lines drawn, but I'm sure they got it correct.

Edit: Images shown at HT demonstrate, as expected, clearly onside.

13
Huge game for Eskas and an OFR for a penalty to Ireland after only fifteen minutes. I think a correct decision.

A few heavy challenges thus far, I think Eskas could do with taking a strict line for now. 

14
I don’t agree with Blind Referee’s comment, I feel the referee was correct to abandon the match, though I am a tad confused as to why they waited until half time if that is the case.

I do wonder where we draw the line though. Any comments on gender, race or sexuality I think we can all agree warrant the most serious response from match officials and governing bodies. But what about personal comments of a different nature? What if a spectator shouted about a referees age, weight, height or other physical characteristics. I’m unsure whether most would support an abandonment for that level of offence.

And how does this scale? I know there is a procedure for EPL and UEFA games for example to deal with chanting by fans and the likes, but if a spectator shouted a sexist comment a female AR say, would the PGMOL back a referee who abandons the game? I doubt it. In that case, we aren’t really worried about the underlying wrongness of what is said, but about how brave we are allowed to be in sending a message.

To be clear, I would have no issue with a referee abandoning a match for any of the reasons I have noted regardless of the level. But I am concerned we are expecting referees with less protection at lower levels to lead the charge while top level officials can turn a deaf ear.

Finally, I agree with bmb that these issues do appear to be getting worse. A great many people seem very detached these days, and while I don’t want to pass some big societal comment, nor am I qualified to do so, I do find in my own life that empathy is a value fast going out of fashion.

15
General Discussion / Re: Lisa Benn
« on: Sat 15 Nov 2025 14:34 »
Thanks for sharing. Very interesting and troubling case. It would also be interesting to discuss but I’ll refrain from doing so until one of the admins looks at this as I know we have to be careful when matters are before the courts.

Pages: [1] 2 3 4 5 6 ... 55