+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 1328
Latest: Ann Frank
New This Month: 9
New This Week: 3
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 97913
Total Topics: 7218
Most Online Today: 286
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 6
Guests: 167
Total: 173

Show Posts

This section allows you to view all posts made by this member. Note that you can only see posts made in areas you currently have access to.


Messages - chikobuk91

Pages: [1]
1
General Discussion / Re: Rob Jones: Brighton v Notts Forest
« on: Mon 23 Sep 2024 08:57 »
A good performance from Rob with correct penalty and red card.

As for the benches, if a referee with the experience of AT thinks they've overstepped the mark then I'll go along with that!

2
General Discussion / Re: Man City v Arsenal - Michael Oliver
« on: Mon 23 Sep 2024 08:54 »
Premier League football at its best...and worst

An enthralling game with too many incidents to dissect individually.

I don't believe Mr Oliver got every decision correct (who does) - but I think he got the big ones correct. Let's put the question back to the players.

"Why did you do that?"

For what its worth, I feel very few referees in world football could have kept that match under control...thankfully our best referee is one of them

3
General Discussion / Re: Man city v Chelsea Michael Oliver
« on: Sat 20 Apr 2024 23:22 »
I am also confused on whether it’s a penalty. I can make an easy explanation for both penalty or no penalty…depending on your personal preference.

As a long time reader, it’s no surprise to me that Phill believes it to be a penalty, based on the referee name maybe??

For what it’s worth, in my opinion, Michael Oliver was just ok today. Certainly nowhere near his best, too many small things wrong and a feeling that he wasn’t quite at his level. My opinion is that he clearly the best referee in this country (by a long way) but today he wasn’t his best.

But if that’s not his best, then god help us poor amateurs trying to get anywhere near his level of quality


4
I have two views on this.

From the depths of my memory, I thought the process was that the VAR had to recommend a review if he/she felt it was a penalty. But then also show any potential fouls before this to allow the referee to decide.

If this is correct, then it's a very good review from VAR.

If this isn't correct, then its a very poor review from VAR

Hopefully PGMOL can explain, or it can feature on the Mic'd up programme.

5
Absolutely clear 2nd YC to Fernandez missed. Only one reason Brooks doesn't give that!

He has had a lot of good games this season, when also not having a lot of big decisions to make. He will learn to make the big decisions in the big games if he wants to get to the very top

6
General Discussion / Re: Clement Turpin - Arsenal vs Porto
« on: Fri 15 Mar 2024 09:23 »
I watched this match, brilliant performance

7
General Discussion / Re: Anthony Taylor and Stuart atwell
« on: Fri 15 Mar 2024 09:22 »
Two poor decisions. One in the VAR area and another with the referee changing his mind.

Pages: [1]