+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 965
Latest: BlindRef
New This Month: 12
New This Week: 2
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 76139
Total Topics: 5613
Most Online Today: 333
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 6
Guests: 107
Total: 113

Author Topic: Arturo Yamasaki Maldonado and Diego De Leo  (Read 172 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

jad

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
    • View Profile
Arturo Yamasaki Maldonado and Diego De Leo
« on: Mon 15 Jun 2020 15:32 »
Given the 50th anniversary and the lack of much other football to talk about, there has much coverage in the Italian media of the semi-final of the 1970 World Cup, in which Italy beat West Germany 4-3.  An article I was reading over the week-end devoted some space to the match referee, Arturo Yamasaki Maldonado.  As may have been discussed here before, this gentleman has the distinction of having officiated at three World cup final tournaments, representing two different countries (and confederations).  In 1962 and 1966 he represented his native Peru, but thereafter moved to Mexico and represented the home country at the 1970 tournament.

His mentor, one Diego De Leo, seems to have been an even more striking character.  Born in Italy in 1920, he refereed briefly in Serie A, before moving to Latin America, where, according to Italian Wikipedia, he was an international-level referee in four different countries: Colombia, Brazil, Chile and finally Mexico, where he settled in 1963 (all this while retaining his Italian citizenship).  As far as I can make out, he seems to have set himself up as a sort of roving mentor and organiser of referees, being one of the first to do this on a professional basis.
 
Along with Yamasaki he was one of the three Mexican officials at the 1970 World Cup, and the story goes (and given that he seems to have been a mate of Joăo Havelange, it may even be true) that he was pencilled in to handle the final, but he could only do so if neither his native nor his adopted country was involved.  So his protégé rather let him down there. 

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Informative Informative x 2 View List

Acme Thunderer

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,429
    • View Profile
Yes, Yamasaki (as he was known) seems to have had an interesting history. He was undoubtedly a rising star at the 1962 Finals where he refereed a QF and SF. However in the 1966 Finals, he refereed only one game, a group game England v France at Wembley which I saw, and he was competent but nothing more. I often wondered why he switched allegiances from Peru to Mexico by the time of the 1970 finals, and perhaps his professional relationship with De Leo was one such reason; also the Mexicans, as host nation, had three referees at the Finals although one would have assumed that Yamasaki would still have featured as the sole representative of his native Peru. Yamasaki was a big guy, a bit like the Great Dane, and had some fairly obvious Japanese features, although any connection there was never mentioned. I always thought it was creating problems pencilling in referees for major Finals - Dagnall, Sbardella, De Leo and Davison all come to mind as referees who have fallen at the final hurdle, and there may well be others closer to the present who have missed out on the ultimate honour for good and bad reasons.   

jad

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 420
    • View Profile
The article I read suggested that it was De Leo who suggested/advised/persuaded Yamasaki to move to Mexico.  I think it was thought that the 1968 Olympics and the 1970 World cup offered more opportunities, and I suppose there was no guarantee that Peru would have a representative in Mexico.  It's also possible that Mexico paid better. 

It seems that Diego De Leo was a bit of a chancer whose career was started by what can most charitably be described as a misunderstanding.  When he first arrived in Argentina, he produced a bit of paper from the Italian FA saying that he was qualified to referee in the 'prima divisione'.   What he omitted to say was that the prima divisione was not, as the Argentinians not unreasonably assumed, the highest tier in Italian football, but a relatively lowly regional competition.  You could get away with things like that in 1948.   
Funny Funny x 2 View List

Timbo

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 185
    • View Profile
I always thought it was creating problems pencilling in referees for major Finals - Dagnall, Sbardella, De Leo and Davison all come to mind as referees who have fallen at the final hurdle, and there may well be others closer to the present who have missed out on the ultimate honour for good and bad reasons.


Clive Thomas - 1978 ?

Acme Thunderer

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,429
    • View Profile
I always thought it was creating problems pencilling in referees for major Finals - Dagnall, Sbardella, De Leo and Davison all come to mind as referees who have fallen at the final hurdle, and there may well be others closer to the present who have missed out on the ultimate honour for good and bad reasons.


Clive Thomas - 1978 ?

I don't think so, even before he caused great controversy in the Sweden v Brazil game. The Italian Gonella was always going to get it in view of international connections, and I think the one who was unlucky was A Klein of Israel who was head and shoulders above any other referee at the finals,  but had to content himself with the 3rd/4th place playoff.