+-

+-User
Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock
Members
Total Members: 965
Latest: BlindRef
New This Month: 12
New This Week: 2
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 76105
Total Topics: 5610
Most Online Today: 101
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 3
Guests: 72
Total: 75
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Wolves v Sevilla  (Read 542 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Carter

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 194
    • View Profile
Wolves v Sevilla
« on: Tue 11 Aug 2020 21:23 »
It appears the continental VARS are no more competent than ours

Video Assistant Referee: Irrati
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Guida

Penalty to Woves, the replays show the keeper who saves the penalty has both feet just in front of the line at the point of contact.

It rebounds to a Sevilla player who definitely was encroaching (amongst others) and he clears the ball.

Logged

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Like Like x 1 View List

Ashington46

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 835
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Ashington, Northumberland
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Retired for years!
Re: Wolves v Sevilla
« Reply #1 on: Tue 11 Aug 2020 22:01 »
Wolves have only themselves to blame for tonight's result. They continued on from where they left off in the PL with constant moaning about every decision instead of getting on with the game and playing football.
We had a referee who ignored players of both sides constantly falling over at the slightest touch and told them to get on with the game.

I honestly don't know why Wolves employed the tactics they did because they just never threatened at all, apart from the penalty.
It was a poor performance by Wolves and they got what they deserved, sadly!
Logged
Referee's decision used to be final!

rustyref

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,631
    • View Profile
Re: Wolves v Sevilla
« Reply #2 on: Tue 11 Aug 2020 22:34 »
Quote from: Carter on Tue 11 Aug 2020 21:23
It appears the continental VARS are no more competent than ours

Video Assistant Referee: Irrati
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Guida

Penalty to Woves, the replays show the keeper who saves the penalty has both feet just in front of the line at the point of contact.

It rebounds to a Sevilla player who definitely was encroaching (amongst others) and he clears the ball.

Don't agree on the keeper, his feet were over the line but that is allowed.  All he needs to have is part of one foot still overhanging the line, and if his trailing foot was over we are talking millimetres.

It should have been retaken though as the defender that got to the ball first was very clearly encroaching before the ball was kicked.
Logged
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Ashington46

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 835
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Ashington, Northumberland
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Retired for years!
Re: Wolves v Sevilla
« Reply #3 on: Tue 11 Aug 2020 23:00 »
Quote from: rustyref on Tue 11 Aug 2020 22:34
Quote from: Carter on Tue 11 Aug 2020 21:23
It appears the continental VARS are no more competent than ours

Video Assistant Referee: Irrati
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Guida

Penalty to Woves, the replays show the keeper who saves the penalty has both feet just in front of the line at the point of contact.

It rebounds to a Sevilla player who definitely was encroaching (amongst others) and he clears the ball.

Don't agree on the keeper, his feet were over the line but that is allowed.  All he needs to have is part of one foot still overhanging the line, and if his trailing foot was over we are talking millimetres.

It should have been retaken though as the defender that got to the ball first was very clearly encroaching before the ball was kicked.

I would mention VAR always being correct, however, I have been forbidden so I won't!  ;D
Logged
Referee's decision used to be final!
Funny Funny x 1 View List

bruntyboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 362
    • View Profile
Re: Wolves v Sevilla
« Reply #4 on: Wed 12 Aug 2020 00:11 »
Quote from: rustyref on Tue 11 Aug 2020 22:34
Quote from: Carter on Tue 11 Aug 2020 21:23
It appears the continental VARS are no more competent than ours

Video Assistant Referee: Irrati
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Guida

Penalty to Woves, the replays show the keeper who saves the penalty has both feet just in front of the line at the point of contact.

It rebounds to a Sevilla player who definitely was encroaching (amongst others) and he clears the ball.

Don't agree on the keeper, his feet were over the line but that is allowed.  All he needs to have is part of one foot still overhanging the line, and if his trailing foot was over we are talking millimetres.

It should have been retaken though as the defender that got to the ball first was very clearly encroaching before the ball was kicked.

Millimetres don't impact on offside decisions so why should they matter on this decision? They are both yes or no decisions.
Logged
Agree Agree x 2 View List

Ref Fan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 987
    • View Profile
Re: Wolves v Sevilla
« Reply #5 on: Wed 12 Aug 2020 10:30 »
I seem to recall Irrati acquired a bit of a reputation on here from earlier posts.

I watched more of the other game and Craig Pawson had a few incidents to adjudicate on.  2 penalty appeals by Basel, a penalty awarded to Shakhtar and
a tight possible offside for Shakhtar's 4th goal.  I expect Michael Oliver, who looked as if he'd been in too much sun, was pleased and relieved that none of the penalty / no penalty decisions were considered to be worth a look at the monitor and likely to lead to his changing his decision.
Logged

rustyref

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,631
    • View Profile
Re: Wolves v Sevilla
« Reply #6 on: Wed 12 Aug 2020 17:58 »
Quote from: bruntyboy on Wed 12 Aug 2020 00:11
Quote from: rustyref on Tue 11 Aug 2020 22:34
Quote from: Carter on Tue 11 Aug 2020 21:23
It appears the continental VARS are no more competent than ours

Video Assistant Referee: Irrati
Assistant Video Assistant Referee: Guida

Penalty to Woves, the replays show the keeper who saves the penalty has both feet just in front of the line at the point of contact.

It rebounds to a Sevilla player who definitely was encroaching (amongst others) and he clears the ball.

Don't agree on the keeper, his feet were over the line but that is allowed.  All he needs to have is part of one foot still overhanging the line, and if his trailing foot was over we are talking millimetres.

It should have been retaken though as the defender that got to the ball first was very clearly encroaching before the ball was kicked.

Millimetres don't impact on offside decisions so why should they matter on this decision? They are both yes or no decisions.

That's kind of my point though, I'm far from convinced there were millimetres in in.  The pundits were going on about how they could see grass between the back of his foot and the line, but I think this was because his heel was raised, a view shared by Peter Walton. 
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »