Login with your social network
0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.
The video is available here for those interested: https://www.bscyb.ch/news?nid=12645#14's tackle given as a yellow looks like SFP. Clearly studs showing and makes contact with the shin, albeit a 'glancing' blow which is probably why he avoided being sent off. Missed RC for me.
The red card given? I'm comfortable with this. I can see a debate on DOGSO or promising attack, but it's a clear shirt pull and RC is definitely defensible.
For the IFK for the penalty, when the still frame is reviewed, player #93 is clearly into the penalty area, whilst defensive #5 doesn't look his feet have crossed the line. Collum is looking and pointing at #93 and he's the player that scores/forces the goal. I don't see a LotG failure here. I'm not sure what you've seen, but the still frame only clearly shows one player entering the penalty area as the kick is taken. Not sure where you think six has come from?
Detailed summary BMB, thank you. I haven’t seen the match yet but from what you’ve written it would seem that Kavanagh could/should have intervened as VAR?
Willie C will get ticks for Key decisions but and this is personal opinions... we must be the lowest of the Elite referees. Even giving the correct decisions he does not look comfortable or inspire confidence.
Quote from: Affy_Moose on Thu 19 Aug 2021 12:50The video is available here for those interested: https://www.bscyb.ch/news?nid=12645#14's tackle given as a yellow looks like SFP. Clearly studs showing and makes contact with the shin, albeit a 'glancing' blow which is probably why he avoided being sent off. Missed RC for me.That is Kharatin - the one I said was more of a red than the red given.Quote from: Affy_Moose on Thu 19 Aug 2021 12:50The red card given? I'm comfortable with this. I can see a debate on DOGSO or promising attack, but it's a clear shirt pull and RC is definitely defensible.DOGSO?? There were 2 defenders right there plus the goalkeeper.Quote from: Affy_Moose on Thu 19 Aug 2021 12:50For the IFK for the penalty, when the still frame is reviewed, player #93 is clearly into the penalty area, whilst defensive #5 doesn't look his feet have crossed the line. Collum is looking and pointing at #93 and he's the player that scores/forces the goal. I don't see a LotG failure here. I'm not sure what you've seen, but the still frame only clearly shows one player entering the penalty area as the kick is taken. Not sure where you think six has come from?Boli (93) didn't score, the defender did. The camera from behind the goal showed 6 players in the box as the kick was taken - granted Boli was first in there, with the defender who scored, (Martins Perera was the one credited). The press were told it was disallowed for a foul. Zeiger is #5 according to the line up sheet so there are 2 of the defenders. I still think it should have been a retake.
I think BMB was referring to UEFA categories, with Collum "Elite" and others Cat 1/2 or even 3
Quote from: RCG on Thu 19 Aug 2021 21:56I think BMB was referring to UEFA categories, with Collum "Elite" and others Cat 1/2 or even 3Indeed I was. We normally get UEFA Cat 2/3 referees on Hungarian games, club and National team, it's rare we get an elite ref, except at big tournaments obviously on the rare occasions we qualify for them!