+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 965
Latest: BlindRef
New This Month: 12
New This Week: 2
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 76105
Total Topics: 5610
Most Online Today: 101
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 80
Total: 80

Author Topic: Stephen Martin, Reading v Hull  (Read 1912 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

James365

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 22
    • View Profile
Re: Stephen Martin, Reading v Hull
« on: Sun 05 Dec 2021 15:12 »
There are 3 penalty decisions in the footage

- Andy Carroll goes down under a challenge. No penalty as very minimal contact and Carroll exaggerated the fall.  Good positioning and good call this by Martin.

- Second one the Reading number 10 goes into the box and the defender pulls out of the challenge hardly anything with contact and and attacker goes over very easily.  For me this is no penalty and also play on. Good acceleration and movement to get a good positioning to see

- The defenders arm is raised and in an unnatural position and this should probably be a penalty.

All in all, three big decisions. Two imho are correct don’t think you can point the finger on the referee and say that he’s had a bad afternoon