+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 965
Latest: BlindRef
New This Month: 12
New This Week: 2
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 76120
Total Topics: 5611
Most Online Today: 193
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 5
Guests: 113
Total: 118

Author Topic: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa  (Read 1418 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

QuoCob

  • RTR Veterans
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 464
  • Gender: Male
  • L5/Ageing but still active...
  • Location: Hampshire
    • View Profile
Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« on: Tue 01 Dec 2020 11:18 »
I think that we are all fed up with talking about VAR, so I won't....
“They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.”  Laurence Binyon

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Funny Funny x 1 Winner Winner x 1 View List

REDSTRIPE

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #1 on: Tue 01 Dec 2020 12:55 »
I think that we are all fed up with talking about VAR, so I won't....
Yeah sick to death of it!

Well , apart from saying , yet again , that it is spoiling football...!!

Claretman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,165
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Nth lincs
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Retired local league
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #2 on: Tue 01 Dec 2020 22:34 »
The people implementing and operating var in the english game are spoiling football.

I thought the var was supposed to help the on field referee by seeing what he has missed and the assistant var
Was there to adjudicate for offsides.
In which case last night the avar would correctly see the villa player was offside when putting the ball in the net.
What was the var ( additional referee ) looking at, he should have been checking for foul play.
If it was deemed the west ham defender wasnt fouling the attacker prior to the ball being crossed then all
Defenders are now allowed to hold attackers to prevent them scoring without committing a foul.
If a penalty had been given, would the defender have been red carded for dogso?
Before the cross was played you would say no, but the events that occurred proved it was.
I guess w ham next opponents might feel hard done by if there had been a sending off?

It seems nothing has been learnt from the van dijk incident in the liverpool derby, where eyes seem to be closed
In the var dept apart from looking at the offside.

One other side line, players will not remain on their feet but go to ground when fouled, unless referees give
The fouls committed if they remain on their feet. Referees are their worst enemies here.
( sorry my pet hate and has been since the days before i hung up my whistle ).
« Last Edit: Tue 01 Dec 2020 22:43 by Claretman »
Agree Agree x 2 View List

ajb95

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,415
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #3 on: Wed 02 Dec 2020 08:27 »
The people implementing and operating var in the english game are spoiling football.

I thought the var was supposed to help the on field referee by seeing what he has missed and the assistant var
Was there to adjudicate for offsides.
In which case last night the avar would correctly see the villa player was offside when putting the ball in the net.
What was the var ( additional referee ) looking at, he should have been checking for foul play.
If it was deemed the west ham defender wasnt fouling the attacker prior to the ball being crossed then all
Defenders are now allowed to hold attackers to prevent them scoring without committing a foul.
If a penalty had been given, would the defender have been red carded for dogso?
Before the cross was played you would say no, but the events that occurred proved it was.
I guess w ham next opponents might feel hard done by if there had been a sending off?

It seems nothing has been learnt from the van dijk incident in the liverpool derby, where eyes seem to be closed
In the var dept apart from looking at the offside.

One other side line, players will not remain on their feet but go to ground when fouled, unless referees give
The fouls committed if they remain on their feet. Referees are their worst enemies here.
( sorry my pet hate and has been since the days before i hung up my whistle ).

Can you with confidence, say it was definitely offside? I can’t

REDSTRIPE

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #4 on: Wed 02 Dec 2020 09:17 »
The people implementing and operating var in the english game are spoiling football.

I thought the var was supposed to help the on field referee by seeing what he has missed and the assistant var
Was there to adjudicate for offsides.
In which case last night the avar would correctly see the villa player was offside when putting the ball in the net.
What was the var ( additional referee ) looking at, he should have been checking for foul play.
If it was deemed the west ham defender wasnt fouling the attacker prior to the ball being crossed then all
Defenders are now allowed to hold attackers to prevent them scoring without committing a foul.
If a penalty had been given, would the defender have been red carded for dogso?
Before the cross was played you would say no, but the events that occurred proved it was.
I guess w ham next opponents might feel hard done by if there had been a sending off?

It seems nothing has been learnt from the van dijk incident in the liverpool derby, where eyes seem to be closed
In the var dept apart from looking at the offside.

One other side line, players will not remain on their feet but go to ground when fouled, unless referees give
The fouls committed if they remain on their feet. Referees are their worst enemies here.
( sorry my pet hate and has been since the days before i hung up my whistle ).

Can you with confidence, say it was definitely offside? I can’t
I can't either.......the more lines they put on there the more confusing it gets.
It is a complete shambles
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Readingfan

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,460
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #5 on: Wed 02 Dec 2020 10:39 »
The people implementing and operating var in the english game are spoiling football.

I thought the var was supposed to help the on field referee by seeing what he has missed and the assistant var
Was there to adjudicate for offsides.
In which case last night the avar would correctly see the villa player was offside when putting the ball in the net.
What was the var ( additional referee ) looking at, he should have been checking for foul play.
If it was deemed the west ham defender wasnt fouling the attacker prior to the ball being crossed then all
Defenders are now allowed to hold attackers to prevent them scoring without committing a foul.
If a penalty had been given, would the defender have been red carded for dogso?
Before the cross was played you would say no, but the events that occurred proved it was.
I guess w ham next opponents might feel hard done by if there had been a sending off?

It seems nothing has been learnt from the van dijk incident in the liverpool derby, where eyes seem to be closed
In the var dept apart from looking at the offside.

One other side line, players will not remain on their feet but go to ground when fouled, unless referees give
The fouls committed if they remain on their feet. Referees are their worst enemies here.
( sorry my pet hate and has been since the days before i hung up my whistle ).

Can you with confidence, say it was definitely offside? I can’t
I can't either.......the more lines they put on there the more confusing it gets.
It is a complete shambles

It looked just offside on first viewing.

Worth saying the added lines were to try and make him 'onside'. Calibration with first defender showed him offside, so they did it with second defender too.

Ultimately, as I've said before, all PL clubs have signed up to this system and referees have to implement what the system tells them. You can't just have one referee suddenly deciding to ignore it.

I agree there was a strong case for a penalty which didn't seem to be fully considered. I guess DOGSO couldn't really be justified because he wasn't in possession until the point at which he was offside.


Ref Fan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 987
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #6 on: Wed 02 Dec 2020 11:29 »
Not having seen this, do I take it that the alleged foul / holding was happening before the ball was played forward?
Presumably if the offence only started after ball contact when passed, offside, if it was, occurred first and the penalty wouldn't be considered anyway.
Or was it happening before and continued after the ball was played?

Apologies if this is not relevant, but I've not seen the film clip.

Ref Watcher

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 626
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #7 on: Thu 03 Dec 2020 11:04 »
Not having seen this, do I take it that the alleged foul / holding was happening before the ball was played forward?
Presumably if the offence only started after ball contact when passed, offside, if it was, occurred first and the penalty wouldn't be considered anyway.
Or was it happening before and continued after the ball was played?

Apologies if this is not relevant, but I've not seen the film clip.
Another thought.  If the foul was inside the penalty area the VAR could (should) have intervened.  If it was outside (for example holding but released before the attacker was inside the area) the VAR couldn't get involved, which seems a bit of a nonsense.  What it really needs is some creative thinking from the officials after viewing this type of incident.  Along the lines of the VAR saying "it was offside but there was a foul by the defender.  Tell them you were playing advantage and go back for the free kick".

rustyref

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,631
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #8 on: Thu 03 Dec 2020 16:51 »
My take on this was that it couldn't be deemed a clear an obvious error as at the time of the holding the ball was out on the wing.  I don't ever remember seeing a penalty given where the ball is that far away simply because the match officials can't possible see it as they aren't looking at it.  Potentially the assistant might be, but no assistant is going to flag for a penalty when the ball is on the wing.

The only reason the holding was spotted by anyone was because of the VAR check, so it wouldn't seem right to be to give a penalty as that wasn't what they were looking for, and a penalty in that situation wouldn't be given in any other game.

Readingfan

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,460
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #9 on: Thu 03 Dec 2020 19:11 »
My take on this was that it couldn't be deemed a clear an obvious error as at the time of the holding the ball was out on the wing.  I don't ever remember seeing a penalty given where the ball is that far away simply because the match officials can't possible see it as they aren't looking at it.  Potentially the assistant might be, but no assistant is going to flag for a penalty when the ball is on the wing.


Surely that's why we have VAR? To spot things the officials can't see.

THE PGMOL are completely losing credibility by trying to justify not giving what TV replays show to be clear fouls. Carragher and Neville ripped them to pieces on Monday night.

Agree Agree x 2 View List

Claretman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 1,165
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Nth lincs
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Retired local league
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #10 on: Thu 03 Dec 2020 22:21 »
Agree with you readingfan, i thought it was the var responsibility to check everything when a goal is scored, not just the offside, in case any infringement has taken place that the on field officials may have missed.

I can see why the on field officials missed it.

Dermot gallacher intiimated on sky sports tue am, an extra appearance, that the var deemed it was not a foul.

rustyref

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,631
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #11 on: Fri 04 Dec 2020 17:01 »
Agree with you readingfan, i thought it was the var responsibility to check everything when a goal is scored, not just the offside, in case any infringement has taken place that the on field officials may have missed.

I think that only relates to the attacking team though, so a reason that would see the goal disallowed.  They aren't looking for offences by defending players and I honestly don't know if they are allowed to do anything about it if they did see anything.

Hendo

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,276
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #12 on: Fri 04 Dec 2020 19:01 »
I remain totally confused 😳
Like Like x 1 View List

JCFC

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,002
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Brighouse
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #13 on: Fri 04 Dec 2020 19:58 »
I remain totally confused 😳

Hendo outs himself as a Premier League referee!
Funny Funny x 4 Winner Winner x 1 View List

Hendo

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,276
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes: West Ham v Aston Villa
« Reply #14 on: Mon 07 Dec 2020 22:09 »
I remain totally confused 😳

Hendo outs himself as a Premier League referee!

Damn, my David Coote disguise has been revealed! 🤪😱