+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 835
Latest: NRUReferee
New This Month: 23
New This Week: 1
New Today: 1
Stats
Total Posts: 66185
Total Topics: 4963
Most Online Today: 49
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 2
Guests: 17
Total: 19

Author Topic: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle  (Read 2214 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

ajb95

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,248
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #15 on: Sun 27 Sep 2020 18:35 »
Well done to Peter Bankes for the worst penalty decision of the season - in a season full of **** decisions.

The lawmakers need to hang their heads in shame at the way the professional (and all) levels of football are turning into. It’s a farce!!

That today has never been handball in any era under any laws!!

You can blame the lawmakers if you want - but I don't think you can blame any specific referee/VAR who have consistently applied the law as directed so far.

There were something like 57 penalties given in Italy last season for handball so I fear you're going to be writing that sort of post a lot this season!

If I have to write it every week so be it

Leggy

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 632
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: East Grinstead
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Long Retired Level 3
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #16 on: Sun 27 Sep 2020 18:54 »
I just saw it. Bankes decision is in accordance with the LOTG. No real complaints.

Then the Law - as Charles Dickens wrote in Oliver Twist - is an ass.

Matt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #17 on: Sun 27 Sep 2020 18:56 »
Maybe english fans, the english media, the english teams should just lump it?

There's a certain air of the english holidaymaker here, English arrogance.

And ajb95 can criticise every referee by name every week, oh and by the way - that today was a handball in the current era of the rules.  Redstripe can come out with these ridiculous assumptions of empty stadiums and not actually knowing who to blame. TAGW can play the "poor Spurs" card all they like but when Spurs start getting these calls they'll probably remain silent.

You can moan all you like about it and act like a 3 year old because he didn't get to watch his tv program when eating his dinner (= full blown tantrum) or you can just move on with your life and accept it.

As Dale said on twitter, if we had implemented it at the same time (just after the world cup) then everyone would've been going off the same interpretation with the momentum of the world cup.
Agree Agree x 2 Disagree Disagree x 1 View List

Readingfan

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,262
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #18 on: Sun 27 Sep 2020 21:03 »
I agree that the English game is attempting to impose its own interpretation on the world game - this interpretation has been seen elsewhere in the world for at least two years (just think back to the 2018 World Cup fianl as mentioned) so it's nothing new for most of the footballing world.

With VAR, FIFA etc had to try and find a universal approach and consistency rather than the precious woolly subjective definition which had loads of debate and disagreement (how many handballs in the penalty area were really 'deliberate'?)

It's jarring because we're not used to it but the trend in Germany is players have adapted and penalties have been reduced. As Graeme Souness said, if you were starting football from scratch now and made a law of 'if the ball hits the hand it will generally be penalised apart from very exceptional circumstances' then there wouldn't necessarily be much dissent.

Agree Agree x 1 View List

DublinRef

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 631
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #19 on: Sun 27 Sep 2020 21:29 »
A case of a perfect application of an imperfect law.

No blame whatsoever on the officials on the day, they did their job as prescribed in law (more particularly its current interpretation).

Now with regard to the question raised by Matt of, "English Arrogance", one cannot help but be somewhat sympathetic to this viewpoint considering the manner in which handball has been more leniently treated in England and particularly with regard to how the EPL implemented VAR. For me though this is really an issue with the law and not with any one country's reaction to its implementation (indeed I fear the reaction had that penalty been given in the Airtricity League here for example!!).

I understand that the law has aimed to take out the subjectiveness in the decision and essentially make it easier for the officials. I feel however that incidents like the one today are extremely difficult to detect live and essentially rely on VAR to be in operation to be penalised consistently. I think 9/10 referees would have played on as Bankes did today without VAR intervention.

Really though the issue is what everyone is saying - the interpretation is just far too harsh and leads to decisions that feel farcical. I think we should go back to trusting referees to decide what is/isn't deliberate handball.

Finally its funny to hear pundits make comments along the lines of "we all know what handball really is" and that VAR is "ruining the spectacle of the game". The same pundits who for years complained of referees inability to understand a players intention and who yearned for video technology to be introduced.......be careful what you wish for??
Like Like x 3 Agree Agree x 2 View List

rustyref

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,378
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #20 on: Sun 27 Sep 2020 22:17 »
A case of a perfect application of an imperfect law.

No blame whatsoever on the officials on the day, they did their job as prescribed in law (more particularly its current interpretation).

Now with regard to the question raised by Matt of, "English Arrogance", one cannot help but be somewhat sympathetic to this viewpoint considering the manner in which handball has been more leniently treated in England and particularly with regard to how the EPL implemented VAR. For me though this is really an issue with the law and not with any one country's reaction to its implementation (indeed I fear the reaction had that penalty been given in the Airtricity League here for example!!).

I understand that the law has aimed to take out the subjectiveness in the decision and essentially make it easier for the officials. I feel however that incidents like the one today are extremely difficult to detect live and essentially rely on VAR to be in operation to be penalised consistently. I think 9/10 referees would have played on as Bankes did today without VAR intervention.

Really though the issue is what everyone is saying - the interpretation is just far too harsh and leads to decisions that feel farcical. I think we should go back to trusting referees to decide what is/isn't deliberate handball.

Finally its funny to hear pundits make comments along the lines of "we all know what handball really is" and that VAR is "ruining the spectacle of the game". The same pundits who for years complained of referees inability to understand a players intention and who yearned for video technology to be introduced.......be careful what you wish for??

Yes, and what has been missed is that Mourinho was jumping up on down on the touchline, with many of his players appealing for a penalty when the ball hit Lascelles' hand even though it was pinned into his body.  Some real cases of double standards here.
Like Like x 1 Agree Agree x 5 View List

bruntyboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 318
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #21 on: Mon 28 Sep 2020 00:25 »
I agree that the English game is attempting to impose its own interpretation on the world game - this interpretation has been seen elsewhere in the world for at least two years (just think back to the 2018 World Cup fianl as mentioned) so it's nothing new for most of the footballing world.

With VAR, FIFA etc had to try and find a universal approach and consistency rather than the precious woolly subjective definition which had loads of debate and disagreement (how many handballs in the penalty area were really 'deliberate'?)

It's jarring because we're not used to it but the trend in Germany is players have adapted and penalties have been reduced. As Graeme Souness said, if you were starting football from scratch now and made a law of 'if the ball hits the hand it will generally be penalised apart from very exceptional circumstances' then there wouldn't necessarily be much dissent.

It's obviously only a universal approach where matches have VAR in use. Have any of these handballs actually been spotted at the time of the offence by the on field referee yet? 

dtrv2

  • RTR Veterans
  • Jr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 74
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #22 on: Mon 28 Sep 2020 00:33 »
It's an interesting one. There's absolutely no fault here with the officials or the VAR system - the problem here is entirely the law itself.

My question is referees are clearly seeing the ball hit the hand/arm at full speed and waving them away only to have to give it by looking at it on the monitor. If referees are seeing it hitting the arm at full speed and judging it not to meet the law requirement, but giving it based on a super slow mo replay, there's clearly an issue with the law as football and people don't move in slow motion.

It does seem like the implementation of VAR has made FIFA/IFAB go haywire with the law, believing the ability to view everything from multiple angles and in super slow mo means they need to make the laws entirely black and white - we saw that with the nonsense accidental handball against attackers last season, and we're seeing it this season with another nonsense forced interpretation of the (formerly) deliberate handball.

I'm not normally one for the hyperbole spouted by pundits and managers, but even I'm starting to lose interest in football with the direction of travel the lawmakers are taking us in. Football matches now seem more of a lottery than ever - it seems teams can level matches or win them by getting penalties by kicking/heading the ball against an entirely unsuspecting defender from point black range, which cannot be right. Humans are not robots and running, jumping, changing direction, sliding all involve natural movements of the arms that you cannot do anything about but this doesn't appear to have been factored into the current law.
Like Like x 1 Agree Agree x 5 Winner Winner x 2 View List

flipmode

  • Administrator
  • Sr. Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 460
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Sydney
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #23 on: Mon 28 Sep 2020 04:58 »
it seems teams can level matches or win them by getting penalties by kicking/heading the ball against an entirely unsuspecting defender from point black range, which cannot be right.

I said the same thing to a friend last night. How is this football when a penalty can be won merely by kicking the ball at the hand of an opponent?
David Silva olé.
Agree Agree x 2 View List

dave26

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 568
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #24 on: Mon 28 Sep 2020 07:36 »
Might aswell change football to Handball 

REDSTRIPE

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 53
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #25 on: Mon 28 Sep 2020 07:55 »
When even the manager who receives the penalty calls it madness , surely that is a sign for Reading Fan etc to get a grip
Like Like x 1 Agree Agree x 1 Dumb Dumb x 1 View List

Matt

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 162
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #26 on: Mon 28 Sep 2020 10:10 »
When even the manager who receives the penalty calls it madness , surely that is a sign for Reading Fan etc to get a grip
Did the same manager allow the goal to be given back to the opposition?

Oh so wait it's wrong but we're not going to be sporting about it? Oh so you mean like the managers just saying nonsense to sound good but is probably absolutely loving the fact his team didn't lose?

Readingfan

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,262
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #27 on: Mon 28 Sep 2020 11:19 »
The question I have is what do cultures outside England think of all of this? If we logged onto the Spanish or South American Rate The Ref site, would they be calling this 'madness' or would they be saying 'That's a clear penalty - what is everyone over there complaining about?'

If the latter, then why should hte English interpretation necessarily be chosen over other views that exist across the world?

Like Like x 1 Agree Agree x 1 View List

Ashington46

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 791
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Ashington, Northumberland
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Retired for years!
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #28 on: Mon 28 Sep 2020 11:41 »
The question I have is what do cultures outside England think of all of this? If we logged onto the Spanish or South American Rate The Ref site, would they be calling this 'madness' or would they be saying 'That's a clear penalty - what is everyone over there complaining about?'

If the latter, then why should hte English interpretation necessarily be chosen over other views that exist across the world?

Perhaps FIFA should carry out a survey of all the 211 countries which are registered members and ask them about handball, after all, they will all be using VAR as well won't they and watching English football on TV so let FIFA earn their keep and ask the relevant questions.
Referee's decision used to be final!

QuoCob

  • RTR Veterans
  • Sr. Member
  • *
  • Posts: 464
  • Gender: Male
  • L5/Ageing but still active...
  • Location: Hampshire
    • View Profile
Re: Peter Bankes- Tottenham Newcastle
« Reply #29 on: Mon 28 Sep 2020 12:38 »
The question I have is what do cultures outside England think of all of this? If we logged onto the Spanish or South American Rate The Ref site, would they be calling this 'madness' or would they be saying 'That's a clear penalty - what is everyone over there complaining about?'

If the latter, then why should hte English interpretation necessarily be chosen over other views that exist across the world?

Perhaps FIFA should carry out a survey of all the 211 countries which are registered members and ask them about handball, after all, they will all be using VAR as well won't they and watching English football on TV so let FIFA earn their keep and ask the relevant questions.

Bundesliga games over the weekend - 9
Penalties awarded                            - 3
Penalties awarded for handball          - 0

Not sure if this means anything, apart from that the BL players have had at least a season to ensure that they don't put their hands in the way of the ball in the penalty area...  ??? ::) ;D
“They shall grow not old as we that are left grow old:
Age shall not weary them, nor the years condemn.
At the going down of the sun and in the morning
We will remember them.”  Laurence Binyon