+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 753
Latest: Terry Colclough
New This Month: 15
New This Week: 2
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 62892
Total Topics: 4708
Most Online Today: 83
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 6
Guests: 48
Total: 54

Author Topic: Peter Bankes : Man Utd vs Nottingham Forest  (Read 617 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

dave26

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 536
    • View Profile
Peter Bankes : Man Utd vs Nottingham Forest
« on: Wed 01 Feb 2023 21:56 »
A good performance by Bankes letís start with the positives -he tried to stay in the background  played some good advantages and diffused the flashpoints with authority and a stern lecture , unfortunately in my opinion his foul detection is random strikes me that heís indecisive and he seems to blow his whistle belatedly when a Foul occurs the YC for Fred was wrong based on the fouls he let go . So not spectacular but not poor either if he could improve his foul detection and be more decisive  he would have all the tools in his arsenal to be a better referee
« Last Edit: Thu 02 Feb 2023 02:40 by dave26 »

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Agree Agree x 2 Creative Creative x 1 View List

bruntyboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 299
    • View Profile
We need an explanation as to why the Weghorst penalty wasn't referred by VAR for an OFR. Also why isn't the AR involved in that foul as he should have been looking straight at it?


jacksamuel21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 957
    • View Profile
We need an explanation as to why the Weghorst penalty wasn't referred by VAR for an OFR. Also why isn't the AR involved in that foul as he should have been looking straight at it?

See the Premier League Sniper has returned. The defender gets the ball. We thirst acts like he is shot. Never a penalty.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

keith h

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 68
    • View Profile
I'm sure Dave he will welcome your advice and heed it

Ref Fan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 923
    • View Profile
We need an explanation as to why the Weghorst penalty wasn't referred by VAR for an OFR. Also why isn't the AR involved in that foul as he should have been looking straight at it?

See the Premier League Sniper has returned. The defender gets the ball. We thirst acts like he is shot. Never a penalty.

I readily acknowledge my eyesight is not what it was, but I wasn't at all convinced the defender got the ball. If Bankes had awarded the penalty, I doubt VAR would have intervened.