+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 953
Latest: Yorksref
New This Month: 21
New This Week: 3
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 75107
Total Topics: 5527
Most Online Today: 129
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 0
Guests: 111
Total: 111

Author Topic: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace  (Read 1327 times)

0 Members and 3 Guests are viewing this topic.

Ben

  • Administrator
  • Full Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 192
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: England
    • View Profile
Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« on: Sat 03 Sep 2022 18:04 »
Order of the day across the premier league seems to have been interesting VAR calls.

Utter disbelief at how Mason and Salisbury have come to this decision though…

https://twitter.com/agbnufc_/status/1566083939319615488?s=21&t=5biZPJdLO5wh9V_lhTheXA

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Agree Agree x 2 View List

ajb95

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,391
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #1 on: Sat 03 Sep 2022 19:01 »
Agreed joint worst of the weekend!

jacksamuel21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 950
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #2 on: Sat 03 Sep 2022 19:43 »
Don’t worry Lee Mason is only VAR for Man United vs Arsenal tomorrow. You really have to question if Salisbury was actually watching the monitor
« Last Edit: Sat 03 Sep 2022 20:11 by jacksamuel21 »
Sad Sad x 1 View List

RCG

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,065
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #3 on: Sat 03 Sep 2022 20:25 »
Given technically that the GK is fouled you cannot play advantage so correct decision is "no goal, penalty"?
Disagree Disagree x 1 View List

Jackinthebox

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #4 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 00:02 »
According to Alan Shearer on motd Salisbury wasn't shown the angel where its obvious Mitchell pushed Willock into the GK. Now I don't know where he has this information from but if true the question has to be why not?

GingerReferee

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 792
  • Gender: Male
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: 5
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #5 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 08:32 »
Don’t worry Lee Mason is only VAR for Man United vs Arsenal tomorrow. You really have to question if Salisbury was actually watching the monitor

United better not get a scandalous decision to win the game tomorrow but the way things are going they will

jacksamuel21

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 950
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #6 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 08:33 »
Don’t worry Lee Mason is only VAR for Man United vs Arsenal tomorrow. You really have to question if Salisbury was actually watching the monitor

United better not get a scandalous decision to win the game tomorrow but the way things are going they will

Always seems that way when Tierney has a big call to make in a united game.

Readingfan

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,443
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #7 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 09:53 »
According to Alan Shearer on motd Salisbury wasn't shown the angel where its obvious Mitchell pushed Willock into the GK. Now I don't know where he has this information from but if true the question has to be why not?

I guess it's because the VAR thought there was a foul on the keeper but didn't think there was a case for a penalty, so that wouldn't have been a consideration for them - of course their reasoning for thinking like that is a different matter!

Bluekipper

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 21
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #8 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 10:09 »
I had a lot of sympathy for Michael Salisbury who I thought got the decision right only to be thrown under a bus by Lee Mason.

To make matters worse we had Mr Sensible Alan Shearer and Danny Murphy suggesting that ex-pros should be in charge of VAR because "they know the game". It would help their cause if they had even a smattering of knowledge of the LOTG.
Agree Agree x 4 View List

Jackinthebox

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 115
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #9 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 10:15 »
It has been mentioned on another Thread, what I did like was again when Michael Salisbury was explaining his decison to Kieron Tierney he pushed away any of his team mates who tried to confront Salisbury. Good captinancy in my view.
Like Like x 1 Agree Agree x 4 View List

Acme Thunderer

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,397
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #10 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 11:34 »
I'm biased but I thought there was a foul on the Palace goalie. Not malicious and maybe not intentional, but the goalie was prevented from getting the ball as a result. But then I'm to the Palace what Shearer is clearly to the Magpies. I'll get my tin hat! 

RCG

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,065
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #11 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 12:28 »
As I put elsewhere, if you ignore how the attacker got where he did, it was a foul.
However, it is so blatantly a push by a badly placed defender.
« Last Edit: Sun 04 Sep 2022 13:48 by charlieboy »
Agree Agree x 1 View List

ajb95

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,391
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #12 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 13:56 »
If he’s going to rule out the goal then surely it’s a penalty for Newcastle for the push by Mitchell into willock into the goalkeeper!?
« Last Edit: Sun 04 Sep 2022 15:21 by ajb95 »
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Boggle

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 39
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #13 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 14:34 »
If we’ve reached the stage where you can be awarded a free kick for shoving an opposition player into your own goalkeeper, we may as well give up. The only feasible decisions were goal or penalty to Newcastle. Somehow Salisbury and Mason came up with a third, entirely incomprehensible outcome.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

jacksback

  • Jr. Member
  • **
  • Posts: 83
    • View Profile
Re: Michael Salisbury - Newcastle v Palace
« Reply #14 on: Sun 04 Sep 2022 15:30 »
Lee Mason - say no more. Should be nowhere near Premier League football
Agree Agree x 1 View List