+-

+-User
Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock
Members
Total Members: 835
Latest: NRUReferee
New This Month: 23
New This Week: 0
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 66274
Total Topics: 4970
Most Online Today: 52
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 2
Guests: 32
Total: 34
« previous next »
Pages: [1]

Author Topic: Discussion Concerns  (Read 1207 times)

0 Members and 0 Guests are viewing this topic.

cwh

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 126
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: amesbury
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: ex level 2/assesor
Re: Discussion Concerns
« on: Thu 16 Mar 2023 04:00 »
Quote from: nemesis on Wed 15 Mar 2023 18:29
Quote from: cwh on Wed 15 Mar 2023 17:25
Quote from: JCFC on Wed 15 Mar 2023 16:21
On a slightly different tack. I may be in a minority of one, but I do find it inappropriate and plain wrong to refer to referees, individually or as a group, as "dross." This reflects badly on the posters who do so.
All referees will make mistakes, all will have matches in which they will feel they not been at their best, but to term them dross is out of order in my mind.

I personly cannot remember this term being used {memory is failing a bit) but I certainly agree with you 100% and I also think that any other derogatory personal terms/words should also be avoided
A memory as far back as this morning should suffice !

Memory must be worse than I thought - although I still cannot see/find any reference to 'dross'
Logged
Pages: [1]
« previous next »