+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 966
Latest: Caro Bates
New This Month: 13
New This Week: 3
New Today: 1
Stats
Total Posts: 76142
Total Topics: 5614
Most Online Today: 154
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 5
Guests: 128
Total: 133

Author Topic: Chelsea v Arsenal  (Read 1330 times)

0 Members and 2 Guests are viewing this topic.

Anna1

  • Newbie
  • *
  • Posts: 32
    • View Profile
Chelsea v Arsenal
« on: Tue 21 Jan 2020 21:29 »
Good performance from Atwell at Chelsea so far tonight penalty and red card spot on

Share on Facebook Share on Twitter

Agree Agree x 1 View List

ajb95

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,415
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #1 on: Tue 21 Jan 2020 22:25 »
Yes red card and pen correct but looked very unconvincing. Luckily not the blood bath of the Xmas game.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Irishref1985

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 436
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #2 on: Wed 22 Jan 2020 01:01 »
Alot of people on this site seem to have issues with Stuart Atwell, but he had a very good game tonight. Credit where credit is due.
Like Like x 2 View List

Acme Thunderer

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,430
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #3 on: Wed 22 Jan 2020 08:50 »
In agreeing with ajb95, yes, Stuart had a reasonable game last night, the great majority of decisions, including cards, were correct and his fitness is without question. However, imo he lacks a certain charisma that would take him to the top. I'm not suggesting that he should aim to be the next Mike Dean but at present, it is all rather mechanical or robotic and he seems to lack much empathy with the players. As a result, I was always waiting for problems to kick off which was a pity since this was an exciting game to watch, particularly the 2nd half.
Agree Agree x 4 View List

carrowman

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 501
  • Location: Norfolk
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Retired
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #4 on: Wed 22 Jan 2020 17:44 »
In agreeing with ajb95, yes, Stuart had a reasonable game last night, the great majority of decisions, including cards, were correct and his fitness is without question. However, imo he lacks a certain charisma that would take him to the top. I'm not suggesting that he should aim to be the next Mike Dean but at present, it is all rather mechanical or robotic and he seems to lack much empathy with the players. As a result, I was always waiting for problems to kick off which was a pity since this was an exciting game to watch, particularly the 2nd half.

But isn't that what the powers that be want, 20 SG1's  that are mechanical. robotic and have no personality.

Whistleblower

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,655
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #5 on: Wed 22 Jan 2020 18:50 »
In agreeing with ajb95, yes, Stuart had a reasonable game last night, the great majority of decisions, including cards, were correct and his fitness is without question. However, imo he lacks a certain charisma that would take him to the top. I'm not suggesting that he should aim to be the next Mike Dean but at present, it is all rather mechanical or robotic and he seems to lack much empathy with the players. As a result, I was always waiting for problems to kick off which was a pity since this was an exciting game to watch, particularly the 2nd half.

But isn't that what the powers that be want, 20 SG1's  that are mechanical. robotic and have no personality.

I fear it probably is ...and why? because for years the Clubs and those who own/run them have screamed out the word Consistency in relation to referees and individualism/personality is not seen as the servant of Consistency, a concept which has been elevated to idol status to which everything else must bow.

nemesis

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,295
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #6 on: Wed 22 Jan 2020 22:31 »
In agreeing with ajb95, yes, Stuart had a reasonable game last night, the great majority of decisions, including cards, were correct and his fitness is without question. However, imo he lacks a certain charisma that would take him to the top. I'm not suggesting that he should aim to be the next Mike Dean but at present, it is all rather mechanical or robotic and he seems to lack much empathy with the players. As a result, I was always waiting for problems to kick off which was a pity since this was an exciting game to watch, particularly the 2nd half.

But isn't that what the powers that be want, 20 SG1's  that are mechanical. robotic and have no personality.

I fear it probably is ...and why? because for years the Clubs and those who own/run them have screamed out the word Consistency in relation to referees and individualism/personality is not seen as the servant of Consistency, a concept which has been elevated to idol status to which everything else must bow.

Consistency, combined with accuracy ?  Loss of "personality" might be a price worth paying but we're not even getting close to either let alone both !!

edited purely to fix quote thingamajigga
« Last Edit: Thu 23 Jan 2020 00:59 by bmb »

lincs22

  • Full Member
  • ***
  • Posts: 100
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #7 on: Thu 23 Jan 2020 08:19 »
I fear it probably is ...and why? because for years the Clubs and those who own/run them have screamed out the word Consistency in relation to referees and individualism/personality is not seen as the servant of Consistency, a concept which has been elevated to idol status to which everything else must bow.

Consistency is a "drive to the lowest common denominator". So, for the 20 SG1's to be consistency, their standards have to be that of the lowest.
Consistency is what all clubs moan about, whereas they actually want the best referees.

If we are not careful, then refereeing will be like the late 90/early 2000's; when Durkin and Riley were the top referees - HELP  ::) :-[ :'( :'( :'( :'(

Whistleblower

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,655
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #8 on: Thu 23 Jan 2020 09:12 »
I fear it probably is ...and why? because for years the Clubs and those who own/run them have screamed out the word Consistency in relation to referees and individualism/personality is not seen as the servant of Consistency, a concept which has been elevated to idol status to which everything else must bow.

Consistency is a "drive to the lowest common denominator". So, for the 20 SG1's to be consistency, their standards have to be that of the lowest.
Consistency is what all clubs moan about, whereas they actually want the best referees.

If we are not careful, then refereeing will be like the late 90/early 2000's; when Durkin and Riley were the top referees - HELP  ::) :-[ :'( :'( :'( :'(

Well, I actually thought Durkin was a top referee. Not world class, as his brief stay at the 1998 World Cup Finals showed, but certainly a very good domestic referee. As to Riley, well the least said the soonest mended.

To broaden out the question of personality. I go to so many matches now where there seem to be identikit referees. It's as if they are manufactured somewhere in a factory just south of Manchester. They look alike, officiate alike and it's hard to notice anything particular about them. Perhaps there is some dreadful cloning experiment going on somewhere though, as m'learned friend nemesis has observed, they don't seem to have perfected the accuracy gene yet ! That is why I welcome referees like Brett Huxtable who doesn't fit into a mould ( except a large one of his very own ) and  do appear to use their personality in controlling a match. I would also include Neil Hair as someone who displays personality in officiating.
Agree Agree x 1 Bad Spelling Bad Spelling x 1 View List

Microscopist

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 635
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #9 on: Thu 23 Jan 2020 09:49 »
I fear it probably is ...and why? because for years the Clubs and those who own/run them have screamed out the word Consistency in relation to referees and individualism/personality is not seen as the servant of Consistency, a concept which has been elevated to idol status to which everything else must bow.

Consistency is a "drive to the lowest common denominator". So, for the 20 SG1's to be consistency, their standards have to be that of the lowest.
Consistency is what all clubs moan about, whereas they actually want the best referees.

If we are not careful, then refereeing will be like the late 90/early 2000's; when Durkin and Riley were the top referees - HELP  ::) :-[ :'( :'( :'( :'(

Well, I actually thought Durkin was a top referee. Not world class, as his brief stay at the 1998 World Cup Finals showed, but certainly a very good domestic referee. As to Riley, well the least said the soonest mended.

To broaden out the question of personality. I go to so many matches now where there seem to be identikit referees. It's as if they are manufactured somewhere in a factory just south of Manchester. They look alike, officiate alike and it's hard to notice anything particular about them. Perhaps there is some dreadful cloning experiment going on somewhere though, as m'learned friend nemesis has observed, they don't seem to have perfected the accuracy gene yet ! That is why I welcome referees like Brett Huxtable who doesn't fit into a mould ( except a large one of his very own ) and  do appear to use their personality in controlling a match. I would also include Neil Hair as someone who displays personality in officiating.
Well it does seem that in the cloning process the personality gene, if present, is recessive.  However, the randomness gene is certainly dominant.  I suspect that this gene escaped from IFAB who seem to specialise in writing laws from which extracts can be taken to justify almost any decision under the sun.  VAR, where it seems futile to discuss individual oddities any more, has rather exemplified this feature.
Like Like x 1 Agree Agree x 1 View List

bmb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,088
  • Gender: Female
  • Causing mischief & mayhem!!
  • Location: Somewhere between Poole & Budapest!
    • View Profile
    • Hungarian Football
  • Referee Level: Observer/Mentor.
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #10 on: Thu 23 Jan 2020 10:28 »
That is why I welcome referees like Brett Huxtable who doesn't fit into a mould ( except a large one of his very own ) and  do appear to use their personality in controlling a match.

Cuddly please! Brett is cuddly! Of course if Brett reads RTR then I am in for a kick up the behind if & when he has the pleasure of seeing me next! As long as I also get a cuddle...  :-*
Hajrá Lilák. Csak a Kispest. Hajrá Magyarok! Hajrá játékvezetői csapat! Soha ne add fel. Nincs sárga kérem!!! No Chris Kavanagh doesn't live in Ashton or even in the Greater Manchester area!!

JCFC

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,002
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Brighouse
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #11 on: Thu 23 Jan 2020 11:00 »
I cannot, of course, speak for Whistleblower, but personally I have no wish to cuddle Mr Huxtable - and I imagine the feeling is mutual.
Funny Funny x 1 View List

JCFC

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,002
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Brighouse
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #12 on: Thu 23 Jan 2020 11:04 »

To broaden out the question of personality. I go to so many matches now where there seem to be identikit referees. It's as if they are manufactured somewhere in a factory just south of Manchester.

I hate to disagree with Whistleblower, but given the rate at which Lancashire-based officials have been propelled upwards in recent seasons, the factory must surely be just North of Manchester.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

Whistleblower

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,655
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #13 on: Thu 23 Jan 2020 11:49 »
I cannot, of course, speak for Whistleblower, but personally I have no wish to cuddle Mr Huxtable - and I imagine the feeling is mutual.

I certainly have no experience of cuddling Mr Huxtable and it would be difficult to imagine circumstances when I would wish to. Perhaps if we were both stranded on an ice floe somewhere with no obvious shelter to hand. I too am certain the feeling would be mutual. However I do re-iterate my assertion that on the three times I've seen him, merely as a spectator in the crowd, he comes across as having an ebullient and pleasant personality which he employs in his refereeing which was, on all three occasions, of a high standard. So, cuddles no but he is certainly a referee who I think it would be a pleasure to meet. Perhaps one day I shall.
Like Like x 1 View List

Whistleblower

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,655
    • View Profile
Re: Chelsea v Arsenal
« Reply #14 on: Thu 23 Jan 2020 11:55 »

To broaden out the question of personality. I go to so many matches now where there seem to be identikit referees. It's as if they are manufactured somewhere in a factory just south of Manchester.

I hate to disagree with Whistleblower, but given the rate at which Lancashire-based officials have been propelled upwards in recent seasons, the factory must surely be just North of Manchester.

 You are absolutely right JCFC. Geography has never been one of my strong points. It wasn't said of me but of another in a School Report under Geography " he does well to find his way home " but it equally applies to me.

Consulting a road atlas, I think perhaps the cloning factory might be based at Ramsbottom.  Over the years Lancashire has certainly produced scores and scores of top flight referees and some of them very good ones indeed.