+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 953
Latest: Yorksref
New This Month: 21
New This Week: 3
New Today: 1
Stats
Total Posts: 75102
Total Topics: 5526
Most Online Today: 148
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 9
Guests: 102
Total: 111

Author Topic: Andre Marriner - LCFC v CFC  (Read 1489 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

ajb95

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,391
    • View Profile
Re: Andre Marriner - LCFC v CFC
« Reply #15 on: Wed 15 Mar 2023 16:39 »
I remember a ref saying, might have been Phil dose, that a red card is a red card no matter no is refereeing, no matter the angle etc.

VAR is showing how poor some referees are at making crucial game changing decisions!

I don't think you are listening to what is being said.  VAR is NOT about getting the correct decision, it is about correcting clear and obvious errors.  The VAR might well watch a replay where the referee has given a caution and think he would have given a red, but that isn't the basis for him to recommend a review.  He has to be 100% sure that the referee was absolutely wrong, that it was a clanger, put it which ever way you like, but the number of VAR recommendations should be very low.  It is designed for game changing decisions such as Thierry Henry's handball against Ireland, not routine penalty or red card decisions.  It should only be used for the type of decisions where 100 referees all watch it and go "whoah, he's dropped a right clanger there".

A quite ridiculous statement here. We all know what var was intending and we all know how it works. But like BMB says, clear and obvious is a an absolute con. If VAR isn’t there to give the correct decision, what is it there for?