+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 965
Latest: BlindRef
New This Month: 12
New This Week: 2
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 76139
Total Topics: 5613
Most Online Today: 99
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 2
Guests: 78
Total: 80

Author Topic: Andre Marriner - LCFC v CFC  (Read 1502 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

Ref Fan

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 987
    • View Profile
Re: Andre Marriner - LCFC v CFC
« Reply #15 on: Mon 13 Mar 2023 14:00 »
On RefWatch, there was mixed opinion as to whether it should have been a RC. Smith said RC, Warnock a YC.  Dermot said that VAR didn't intervene because they didn't consider it a RC without making clear his own opinion as far as I could tell.
What they did all agree on was that there should have been a greater sanction by Andre Marriner than just a foul.

With regard to the follow through to Havertz's chest, I think the view was that it should have been a YC.  Was that the challenge Marriner didn't even give a foul for?

To be honest, I'm not sure that's the sort of consistency we want to see.  1 foul for 2 challenges that should have brought at least YCs.

There was unanimity that the upgrade to a RC for Casemiro was correct.  How AT only deemed it a YC from a few yards away and a clear view wasn't discussed.  And was it just me that found it slightly ironic after his Saturday game, Andre Marriner was the VAR who advised a FIFA elite referee he had made an obvious and clear error and to review it at the monitor.