+-

+-User

Welcome, Guest.
Please login or register.
 
 
 

Login with your social network

Forgot your password?

+-Stats ezBlock

Members
Total Members: 953
Latest: Yorksref
New This Month: 21
New This Week: 3
New Today: 0
Stats
Total Posts: 75108
Total Topics: 5527
Most Online Today: 129
Most Online Ever: 17046
(Mon 29 Mar 2021 19:08)
Users Online
Members: 1
Guests: 101
Total: 102

Author Topic: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham  (Read 4214 times)

0 Members and 1 Guest are viewing this topic.

bruntyboy

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 353
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #60 on: Fri 19 Aug 2022 21:24 »
https://www.mailplus.co.uk/edition/sport/213366/mike-dean-i-got-it-wrong-on-romeros-hair-pull
Good to see some transparency.

"...In the few seconds I had to study Romero pulling Cucurella’s hair, I didn't deem it a violent act.""

Why didn't he take a longer time to look at it? How many times on VAR reviews are they looking at things for ages and from all different angles especially on SFP or VC incidents? 
Agree Agree x 5 View List

bmb

  • Administrator
  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 6,047
  • Gender: Female
  • Causing mischief & mayhem!!
  • Location: Somewhere between Poole & Budapest!
    • View Profile
    • Hungarian Football
  • Referee Level: Observer/Mentor.
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #61 on: Fri 19 Aug 2022 21:40 »

"...In the few seconds I had to study Romero pulling Cucurella’s hair, I didn't deem it a violent act.""



Have to agree. I can accept that from the on field referee any day of the week. It doesn't matter which way they seem to be looking, facing an incident doesn't equal their eyes being on the point of infringement, imo. We've all been there, we know it's a split second view and more often than not obstructed. VAR cannot & should never be allowed to have that excuse. They have goodness knows how many camera angles, they can use slo mo, they can zoom in and even pause an incident.
Hajrá Lilák. Csak a Kispest. Hajrá Magyarok! Hajrá játékvezetői csapat! Soha ne add fel. Nincs sárga kérem!!! No Chris Kavanagh doesn't live in Ashton or even in the Greater Manchester area!!
Agree Agree x 2 View List

PhiltheRef

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #62 on: Fri 19 Aug 2022 23:07 »
He is indeed widely referred to as "Tayls"

nemesis

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,277
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #63 on: Sun 21 Aug 2022 10:13 »
He is indeed widely referred to as "Tayls"

Absolutely not. If you look at the target audience for his comments, which is categorically not his refereeing community cronies, I'd guess substantially less than 1% would have the slightest clue that was his nickname. I follow refereeing more closely than most and I was unaware. They could have taken the name on a stage and called him heads
Agree Agree x 1 View List

TVOS

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,445
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #64 on: Sun 21 Aug 2022 11:16 »
He is indeed widely referred to as "Tayls"

But not in that article by Mike Dean, so whoever calls him "Tayls" is irrelevant.

rustyref

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,602
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #65 on: Sun 21 Aug 2022 13:34 »
He is indeed widely referred to as "Tayls"

Absolutely not. If you look at the target audience for his comments, which is categorically not his refereeing community cronies, I'd guess substantially less than 1% would have the slightest clue that was his nickname. I follow refereeing more closely than most and I was unaware. They could have taken the name on a stage and called him heads

That is pretty much my point though.  No one calls him Anthony, but Mike Dean knew he couldn't put Tayls in a newspaper article so instead put Taylor.  Nothing to see here, move on.
Agree Agree x 1 View List

JCFC

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 1,977
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Brighouse
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #66 on: Sun 21 Aug 2022 13:54 »
I shall move on - with a typically irrelevant question: Is "Tayls" the recognised nickname for  a person called Taylor? Is it a regional one or a difference in time? In my distant youth in Huddersfield, any Taylor was called "Tats", while more recently (only 35 years ago!) in NE Lancashire the equivalent was "Taz."

Acme Thunderer

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,397
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #67 on: Sun 21 Aug 2022 14:32 »
I don't mind him being called 'AT'
Like Like x 2 View List

Whistleblower

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,627
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #68 on: Sun 21 Aug 2022 15:37 »
I shall move on - with a typically irrelevant question: Is "Tayls" the recognised nickname for  a person called Taylor? Is it a regional one or a difference in time? In my distant youth in Huddersfield, any Taylor was called "Tats", while more recently (only 35 years ago!) in NE Lancashire the equivalent was "Taz."

Not among people called Taylor of my acquaintance.  I don't believe the late Lord Taylor of Gosforth who produced the Taylor Report after the Hillsborough Stadium Disaster Inquiry was ever referred to as Tayls, Tats  or Taz.

Whistleblower

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,627
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #69 on: Sun 21 Aug 2022 15:43 »
I don't know but I cannot imagine that the late and great Jack Taylor OBE would have been known by these diminutive nicknames; certainly he makes no mention of a nickname in his autobiography.

Readingfan

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,443
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #70 on: Mon 22 Aug 2022 15:51 »
I'm sure the PGMO have sanctioned Dean's column and will have some input in what Dean puts in it.

I think something like this is long overdue from the PGMO. You need to have a way of communicating with the general public. This is one way of having a platform to highlight good refereeing decisions and positive refereeing stories when they happen, provide some clarity when there is confusion/uncertainty, and also offer some accountability when mistakes are made.
Disagree Disagree x 1 View List

ajb95

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 2,391
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #71 on: Mon 22 Aug 2022 17:32 »
But why did he have to pick the daily Mail? 😒
Agree Agree x 1 View List

PhiltheRef

  • Sr. Member
  • ****
  • Posts: 470
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #72 on: Mon 22 Aug 2022 18:27 »
Why would anyone pick the Daily Fail for anything?
Like Like x 1 Agree Agree x 2 View List

Whistleblower

  • RTR Veterans
  • Hero Member
  • *
  • Posts: 2,627
    • View Profile
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #73 on: Tue 23 Aug 2022 09:17 »
But why did he have to pick the daily Mail? 😒

Presumably because they are the ones who offered the gig or maybe the best remuneration.
Like Like x 1 Winner Winner x 1 View List

Ashington46

  • Hero Member
  • *****
  • Posts: 831
  • Gender: Male
  • Location: Ashington, Northumberland
    • View Profile
  • Referee Level: Retired for years!
Re: A TAYLOR - Chelsea v Tottenham
« Reply #74 on: Tue 23 Aug 2022 11:27 »
Why would anyone pick the Daily Fail for anything?

Have you tried the centre pages with all the puzzles, word games, maths problems and cryptic crosswords? Keeps my brain occupied for a couple of hours and doesn't do me any harm at all.
It is believing the contents of that or any other media outlet that does harm, like doctors, hospitals and politicians they are best avoided.
Referee's decision used to be final!
Agree Agree x 2 View List