Definitely not a penalty when Moura was fouled by Kepa. VAR correct to override for the second time.
I haven't seen the incident but if he was "fouled by Kepa" then why wouldn't it be a penalty? Or are you saying he wasn't fouled by Kepa?
There definately wasn’t a foul by Kepa , he took the ball cleanly , Marriner would have been better to let play develop and send the penalty appeal to VAR
I know they allow play to develop for VAR to check later when there is an offside "just in case" but surely they are not supposed to do that when a foul is involved. That seems like a recipe for all sorts of retribution to take place.