RateTheRef

However good Lahoz has been I absolutely hate the way he conducts himself by emphatically telling players to get up which I feel is sometimes quite aggressive

I know many of you here will probably disagree

Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties that we would have got all of our players were offside in the build up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got me and I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty taker for the shootout because sporting went down to ten men, didn't know that was a thing just thought it would role back around if it got that far but It didn't bu also think it is slightly unfair because why should we lose a penalty taker because the opposition had a player sent off

Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties that we would have got all of our players were offside in the build up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got me and I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty taker for the shootout because sporting went down to ten men, didn't know that was a thing just thought it would role back around if it got that far but It didn't bu also think it is slightly unfair because why should we lose a penalty taker because the opposition had a player sent off

It should be an advantage to lose a penalty taker in such a case as you can nominate the person you least think will score, you still get the same amount of kicks but you rest your worst kicker.
Thought Lahoz had a pretty good game, only major query was playing advantage when the sporting player received a second yellow resulting in a red and another sporting player then committed a foul for which he received a yellow too.
Unfortunately for Martinelli football has a habit of kicking you in the teeth.

Quote from: MCPridz on Thu 16 Mar 2023 23:02

Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties that we would have got all of our players were offside in the build up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got me and I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty taker for the shootout because sporting went down to ten men, didn't know that was a thing just thought it would role back around if it got that far but It didn't bu also think it is slightly unfair because why should we lose a penalty taker because the opposition had a player sent off

It should be an advantage to lose a penalty taker in such a case as you can nominate the person you least think will score, you still get the same amount of kicks but you rest your worst kicker.
Thought Lahoz had a pretty good game, only major query was playing advantage when the sporting player received a second yellow resulting in a red and another sporting player then committed a foul for which he received a yellow too.
Unfortunately for Martinelli football has a habit of kicking you in the teeth.

Yeah Sporting deserved it we ere poor in spells, did think Lahoz did let a few things go but he was better than I thought he was going to be and feared the worse, but going back to the penalties situation, I think it would of been a advantage even to have our worse taker because if it got that far which it didn't there GK would of been stepping up against one of our outfield players giving us an advantage, but like I said didn't get that far anyway and sporting deserved it, just wish Ramsdale had stayed on his line, or our players stayed onside, would of rather had lost in 90 than play 120 and lose on pens with a crucial league game coming up at weekend

Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties that we would have got all of our players were offside in the build up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got me and I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty taker for the shootout because sporting went down to ten men, didn't know that was a thing just thought it would role back around if it got that far but It didn't bu also think it is slightly unfair because why should we lose a penalty taker because the opposition had a player sent off

Because that is what the LOTG say has to happen.

Law 10.3:
If at the end of the match and before or during the kicks one team has a greater number of players than its opponents, it must reduce its numbers to the same number as its opponents and the referee must be informed of the name and number of each player excluded. Any excluded player is not eligible to take part in the kicks

Quote from: bmb on Fri 17 Mar 2023 03:15

Quote from: MCPridz on Thu 16 Mar 2023 23:02

Thought Lahoz was ok, unfortunately for us the 3 penalties that we would have got all of our players were offside in the build up and all the correct decisions, but the thing that got me and I didn't know this was that we had to lose a penalty taker for the shootout because sporting went down to ten men, didn't know that was a thing just thought it would role back around if it got that far but It didn't bu also think it is slightly unfair because why should we lose a penalty taker because the opposition had a player sent off

Because that is what the LOTG say has to happen.

Law 10.3:
If at the end of the match and before or during the kicks one team has a greater number of players than its opponents, it must reduce its numbers to the same number as its opponents and the referee must be informed of the name and number of each player excluded. Any excluded player is not eligible to take part in the kicks

Thanks for that never knew that was a law and was the first time I seen it last night and did find it strange we had to lose a player in the shootout, still think it is slightly unfair though even if a law because why should the team with 11 men on the field lose an advantage

If you have 11 then you could have your worst taker up against their best. Thats not fair.

I think rusty means the team with ten's best taker.